Eur. J. Entomol. 109 (4): 543-552, 2012 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2012.068

Habitat use governs distribution patterns of saprophagous (litter-transforming) macroarthropods - a case study of British woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea)

Bethan V. PURSE1, Steve J. GREGORY2, Paul HARDING3, Helen E. ROY3
1 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, UK; e-mail: beth@ceh.ac.uk
2 British Myriapod & Isopod Group, www.BMIG.org.uk; e-mail: steve.gregory@earthtrust.org
3 Biological Records Centre, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK; e-mails: pha@ceh.ac.uk; hele@ceh.ac.uk

Despite the importance of saprophagous macroarthropods as key facilitators of plant litter decomposition within ecosystems and their likely sensitivity to global climate change and land-use change, a lack of ecological data has precluded attempts to explain their distribution patterns in terms of traits. Using an extensive set of large-scale and long-term biological records, the distribution patterns of 33 woodlice (Crustacea: Oniscidea) species in Britain were characterised by their range size (area of occupancy) and aggregation (degree to which occupied squares are clustered across the range). Body size and seven ecological traits were examined as correlates of range size and fill, while controlling for phylogeny and recording intensity, and comparing fine and broad-scale measures of habitat heterogeneity. Species that used a greater diversity of habitats had larger range sizes. Broad categorisation of habitats (by dominant vegetation) alongside other traits was less accurate in predicting range size than fine-scale habitat (microsites where individuals were discovered) data. The latter explained 25% more variance than broad-scale habitat data, highlighting the value of coupling biological recording of species with data on micro-habitat. Habitat use is an important trait in explaining distribution patterns and we conclude that ensuring land cover heterogeneity will favour conservation of saprophagous macro-arthropod diversity.

Keywords: Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea, decomposition, habitat breadth, niche breadth, range size, recording intensity, saprophagous

Received: December 6, 2011; Revised: July 2, 2012; Accepted: July 2, 2012; Published: October 5, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PURSE, B.V., GREGORY, S.J., HARDING, P., & ROY, H.E. (2012). Habitat use governs distribution patterns of saprophagous (litter-transforming) macroarthropods - a case study of British woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea). EJE, 109(4), 543-552. doi: 10.14411/eje.2012.068
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BECK J. & KITCHING I.J. 2007: Correlates of range size and dispersal ability: a comparative analysis of sphingid moths from the Indo-Austalian tropics. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 341-349 Go to original source...
    2. BOLGER D.T., SUAREZ A.V., CROOKS K.R., MORRISON S.A. & CASE T.J. 2000: Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in southern California: area, age, and edge effects. Ecol. Appl. 10: 1230-1248 Go to original source...
    3. BONTE D., BAERT L., LENS L. & MAELFAIT J.P. 2004: Effects of aerial dispersal, habitat specialisation, and landscape structure on spider distribution across fragmented grey dunes. Ecography 27: 343-349 Go to original source...
    4. BRANDLE M., OHLSCHLAGER S. & BRANDL R. 2002: Range size in butterflies: correlation across scales. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 993-1004
    5. COMONT R.F., ROY H.E., LEWIS O.T., HARRINGTON R., SHORTALL C. & PURSE B.V. 2012: Using biological traits to explain lady bird distribution patterns. J. Biogeogr. 39: doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02734.x Go to original source...
    6. CONDIT R., ASHTON P.S., BAKER P., BUNYAVEJCHEWIN S., GUNATILLEKE S., GUNATILLEKE N., HUBBELL S.P., FOSTER R.B., ITOH A., LAFRANKIE J.V., SENG LEE H., LOSOS E., MONKARAN N., SUKUMAR R. & YAMAKURA T. 2000: Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288: 1414-1418 Go to original source...
    7. COWLEY M.J.R., THOMAS C.D., ROY D.B., WILSON R.J., LEONCORTES J.L., GUTIERREZ D., BULMAN C.R., QUINN R.M., MOSS D. & GASTON K.J. 2001: Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 410-425 Go to original source...
    8. DALLINGER R., BERGER B. & BIRKEL S. 1992: Terrestrial isopods: useful bioindicators of urban metal pollution. Oecologia 89: 32-41 Go to original source...
    9. DAUBER J., PURTAUF T., ALLSPACH A., FRISCH J., VOIGTLANDER K. & WOLTERS V. 2005: Local vs. landscape controls on diversity: a test using surface-dwelling soil macroinvertebrates of differing mobility. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 14: 213-221 Go to original source...
    10. DAVID J.F. & GILLON D. 2009: Combined effects of elevated temperatures and reduced leaf litter quality on the life-history parameters of a saprophagous macroarthropod. Global Change Biol. 15: 156-165 Go to original source...
    11. DAVID J.F. & HANDA I.T. 2010: The ecology of saprophagous macroarthropods (millipedes, woodlice) in the context of global change. Biol. Rev. 85: 881-895 Go to original source...
    12. DAVIES C.E., MOSS D. & HILL M.O. 2004: EUNIS Habitat Classification, Revised 2004. Report to European Environment Agency. European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity
    13. DAVIS R.C. & SUTTON S.L. 1978: A comparative study of changes in biomass of isopods inhabiting dune grassland. Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. (A) 6: 223-233
    14. DECAENS T. 2010: Macroecological patterns in soil communities. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 287-302 Go to original source...
    15. DONOSO D.A., JOHNSTON M.K. & KASPARI M. 2010: Trees as templates for tropical litter arthropod diversity. Oecologia 164: 201-211 Go to original source...
    16. EWERS R.M. & DIDHAM R.K. 2006: Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 81: 117-142 Go to original source...
    17. FATTORINI S. 2011: Insect rarity, extinction and conservation in urban Rome (Italy): a 120-year-long study of tenebrionid beetles. Insect Conserv. Divers. 4: 307-315 Go to original source...
    18. FITZPATRICK U., MURRAY T.E., PAXTON R.J., BREEN J., COTTON D., SANTORUM V. & BROWN M.J.F. 2007: Rarity and decline in bumblebees - a test of causes and correlates in the Irish fauna. Biol. Conserv. 136: 185-194 Go to original source...
    19. FULLER R.M., COX R., CLARKE R.T., ROTHERY P., HILL R.A., SMITH G.M., THOMSON A.G., BROWN N.J., HOWARD D.C. & STOTT A.P. 2005: The UK land cover map 2000: Planning, construction and calibration of a remotely sensed, useroriented map of broad habitats. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 7: 202-216 Go to original source...
    20. FRECKLETON R.P., HARVEY P.H. & PAGEL M. 2002: Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712-725 Go to original source...
    21. GASTON K.J. & FULLER R.A. 2009: The sizes of species' geographic ranges. J. Appl. Ecol. 46: 1-9 Go to original source...
    22. GASTON K.J., BLACKBURN T.M. & LAWTON J.H. 1997: Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 579-601 Go to original source...
    23. GASTON K.J., BLACKBURN T.M. & SPICER J.I. 1998: Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 70-74 Go to original source...
    24. GONGALSKY K.B., SAVIN F.A., POKARZHEVSKII A.D. & FILIMONOVA Z.V. 2005: Spatial distribution of isopods in an oak-beech forest. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 41: 117-122 Go to original source...
    25. GREGORY S. 2009: Woodlice and Waterlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea & Asellota) in Britain and Ireland. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, 176 pp Go to original source...
    26. GREGORY R.D. & GASTON K.J. 2000: Explanations of commonness and rarity in British breeding birds: separating resource use and resource availability. Oikos 88: 515-526 Go to original source...
    27. GUTIERREZ D. & MENENDEZ R. 1997: Patterns in the distribution, abundance and body size of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) in relation to dispersal ability. J. Biogeogr. 24: 903-914 Go to original source...
    28. HANSKI I., KOUKI J. & HALKKA A. 1993: Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. In Ricklefs R.E. & Schluter D. (eds): Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 108-116
    29. HARDING P.T. & SUTTON S.L. 1985: Woodlice in Britain and Ireland: Distribution and Habitat. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, 151 pp
    30. HARTLEY S., KUNIN W.E., LENNON J.J. & POCOCK M.J.O. 2004: Coherence and discontinuity in the scaling of species distribution patterns. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. (B) 271: 81-88 Go to original source...
    31. HASSALL M., TUCK J.M., SMITH D.W., GILROY J.J., ADDISON R.K. 2002: Effects of spatial heterogeneity on feeding behaviour of Porcellio scaber (Isopoda: Oniscidea). Eur. J. Soil Biol. 38: 53-57 Go to original source...
    32. HATTENSCHWILER S., TIUNOV A.V. & SCHEU S. 2005: Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 191-218 Go to original source...
    33. HOLT R.D. 2003: On the evolutionary ecology of species ranges. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 159-178
    34. JONES K.E., PURVIS A. & GITTLEMAN J.L. 2003: Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats. Am. Nat. 161: 601-614 Go to original source...
    35. JUDD S. & HORWITZ P. 2003: Diversity and biogeography of terrestrial isopods (Isopoda, Oniscidea) from southwestern Australia: organic matter and microhabitat utilization in seasonally dry landscapes. Crustac. Monogr. 2: 191-215 Go to original source...
    36. KOTZE D.J., NIEMELA J., O'HARA R.B. & TURIN H. 2003: Testing abundance-range size relationships in European carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ecography 26: 553-566 Go to original source...
    37. LAVELLE P., BIGNELL D., LEPAGE M., WOLTERS V., ROGER P., INESON P., HEAL O.W. & DHILLION S. 1997: Soil function in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 33: 159-193
    38. MARAUN M., MARTENS H., MIGGE S., THEENHAUS A. & SCHEU S. 2003: Adding the "the enigma of soil animal diversity": fungal feeders and saprophagous soil invertebrates prefer similar food substrates. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 39: 85-95 Go to original source...
    39. MCCULLAGH P. & NELDER J.A. 1989: Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London, 511 pp Go to original source...
    40. MCNALLY R. 2002: Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 1397-1401 Go to original source...
    41. OLIVER T.H., HILL J.K., THOMAS C.D., BRERETON T. & ROY D.B. 2009: Changes in habitat specificity of species at their climatic range boundaries. Ecol. Lett. 12: 1091-1102 Go to original source...
    42. PAGEL M. 1999: The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. System. Biol. 48: 612-622 Go to original source...
    43. PAOLETTI M.G. & HASSALL M. 1999: Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea): their potential for assessing sustainability and use as bioindicators. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 157-165. Go to original source...
    44. PAOLETTI M.G., OSLER G.H.R., KINNEAR A., BLACK D.J., THOMSON L.J., TSITSILAS A., SHARLEY D., JUDD S., NEVILLE P. & D'INCA A. 2007: Detritivores as indicators of landscape stress and soil degradation. Austr. J. Exp. Agric. 47: 412-423 Go to original source...
    45. PARADIS E.J., CLAUDE J. & STRIMMER K. 2004: APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289-290 Go to original source...
    46. PEITGEN H.-O., JURGENS H. & SAUPE D. 1992: Fractals for the Classroom. Part One: Introduction to Fractals and Chaos. Springer, New York, 450 pp Go to original source...
    47. POCOCK M.J.O., HARTLEY S., TELFER M.G., PRESTON C.D. & KUNIN W.E. 2006: Ecological correlates of range structure in rare and scarce British plants. J. Ecol. 94: 581-596 Go to original source...
    48. QUINN G.P. & KEOUGH M.J. 2002: Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xvii + 537 pp Go to original source...
    49. RUNDLE S.D., BILTON D.T., ABBOTT J.C. & FOGGO A. 2007: Range size in North American Enallagma damselflies correlates with wing size. Freshw. Biol. 52: 471-477 Go to original source...
    50. RUSHTON S.P. & HASSALL M. 1987: Effects of food quality on Isopod population dynamics. Funct. Ecol. 1: 359-367 Go to original source...
    51. SOUTY-GROSSET C., BADENHAUSSER I., REYNOLDS J.D. & MOREL A. 2005: Investigations on the potential of woodlice as bioindicators of grassland habitat quality. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 41: 109-116 Go to original source...
    52. SMART S., MASKELL L.C., DUNBAR M.J., EMMETT B.A., MARKS S., NORTON L.R., ROSE P., HENRYS P. & SIMPSON I.C. 2010: An Integrated Assessment of Countryside Survey Data to Investigate Ecosystem Services in Great Britain. NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, UK, 230 pp
    53. SUTTON S.L., HASSALL M., WILLOWS R., DAVIS R.C., GRUNDY A. & SUNDERLAND K.D. 1984: Life histories of terrestrial isopods: a study of intra- and interspecific variation. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 53: 269-294
    54. TAJOVSKY K. 2001: Colonization of colliery spoil heaps by millipedes (Diplopoda) and terrestrial isopods (Oniscidea) in the Sokolov region, Czech Republic. Restor. Ecol. 9: 365-369 Go to original source...
    55. TOPP W., KAPPES H., KULFAN J. & ZACH P. 2005: Distribution pattern of woodlice (Isopoda) and millipedes (Diplopoda) in four primeval forests of the Western Carpathians (Central Slovakia) Soil Biol. Biochem. 38: 43-50 Go to original source...
    56. TSAI M., DAI C. & CHEN H. 1998: Desiccation resistance of two semiterrestrial isopods, Ligia exotica and Ligia taiwanensis (Crustacea) in Taiwan. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. (A) 119: 361-367 Go to original source...
    57. VILISICS F., ELEK Z., LOVEI G.L. & HORNUNG E. 2007: Composition of terrestrial isopod assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. Pedobiologia 51: 45-53 Go to original source...
    58. WANG M. & SCHREIBER A. 1999: Population differentiation of the woodlouse Oniscus asellus in Central Europe (Isopoda: Oniscoidea). J. Crustac. Biol. 19: 301-312 Go to original source...
    59. WARBURG M.R., LINSENMAIR K.E. & BERCOVITZ K. 1984: The effect of climate on the distribution and abundance of Isopods. Sympos. Zool. Soc. Lond. 53: 339-367
    60. WARDLE D.A. 2002: Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 400 pp
    61. WEISBERG S. 1980: Applied Linear Regression. Wiley, New York, 310 pp
    62. WILLIAMSON M. & GASTON K.J. 1999: A simple transformation for sets of range sizes. Ecography 22: 674-680 Go to original source...
    63. WILSON R.J., THOMAS C.D., FOX R., ROY D.B. & KUNIN W.E. 2004: Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change. Nature 432: 393-396 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content