Eur. J. Entomol. 102 (3): 371-383, 2005 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2005.054

The quality of aphids as food for generalist predators: implications for natural control of aphids

Søren TOFT
Department of Ecology & Genetics, Institute of Biological Sciences, Aarhus University, Building 540, DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark;

The paper reviews existing data on the food quality of cereal aphids for generalist predators. Data are presented for spiders, harvestmen, carabid and staphylinid beetles, cockroaches, ants and one species of bird. All results agree that cereal aphids are low-quality food compared to alternative prey types (in most studies fruit flies). This is associated both with a low consumption capacity for aphids and a low utilization efficiency of the aphid food. A pure aphid diet allows full juvenile development in only a few species. Aphids as part of mixed diets can have negative, neutral or positive effects, which depends on the quality of the remaining diet. The low consumption capacity for aphids is due to the development of a specific feeding aversion. Genetic variation in the ability to tolerate aphids has been documented, indicating that predators may be able to adapt to a higher proportion of aphids in the diet in areas where outbreaks are frequent. A consequence of these findings is that predator populations rely on alternative prey (e.g. Collembola and Diptera) for maintenance and reproduction, and are probably unable to benefit nutritionally from an aphid outbreak. The low food quality of aphids to generalist predators explains why generalist and specialist predators have widely different roles in aphid biocontrol, but does not rule out that under some conditions the generalists may be able to inhibit aphid population growth sufficiently to prevent an outbreak, as field experiments have indicated. Simulation modelling shows that a low consumption capacity for aphids has little influence on the ability to prevent aphid population increase at low aphid immigration rates, but a great influence at high aphid immigration rates. Modelling also indicates that there may be an optimal availability of high-quality alternative prey that maximizes the impact of generalist predators on aphid population growth.

Keywords: Polyphagous aphidiphages, specialist aphidiphages, true generalist predators, alternative prey, Araneae, Opiliones, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Dictyoptera, Aves

Received: March 1, 2005; Revised: May 10, 2005; Accepted: May 10, 2005; Published: August 15, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
TOFT, S. (2005). The quality of aphids as food for generalist predators: implications for natural control of aphids. EJE102(3), 371-383. doi: 10.14411/eje.2005.054
Download citation

References

  1. ALDERWEIRELDT M. 1994: Prey selectiom and prey capture strategies of linyphiid spiders in high-input agricultural fields. Bull. Brit. Arachnol. Soc. 9: 300-308
  2. BECK J.B. & TOFT S. 2000: Artificial selection for aphid tolerance in the polyphagous predator, Lepthyphantes tenuis (Araneae: Linyphiidae). J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 547-556 Go to original source...
  3. BERNAYS E.A. 2001: Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host afiliation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 703-727 Go to original source...
  4. BILDE T. & TOFT S. 1994: Prey preference and egg production of the carabid beetle Agonum dorsale. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 73: 151-156 Go to original source...
  5. BILDE T. & TOFT S. 1997a: Limited predation capacity by generalist arthropod predators on the cereal aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi. Org. Agric. Hort. 20: 143-150 Go to original source...
  6. BILDE T. & TOFT S. 1997b: Consumption by carabid beetles of three cereal aphid species relative to other prey types. Entomophaga 42: 21-32 Go to original source...
  7. BILDE T. & TOFT S. 1998: Quantifying food limitation of arthropod predators in the field. Oecologia 115: 54-58 Go to original source...
  8. BILDE T. & TOFT S. 1999: Prey consumption and fecundity of the carabid beetle Calathus melanocephalus on diets of three ceral aphids: high consumption rates of low-quality prey. Pedobiologia 43: 422-429
  9. BILDE T. & TOFT S. 2000: Evaluation of prey for the spider Dicymbium brevisetosum Locket (Araneae: Linyphiidae) in single-species and mixed-species diets. Ekologia (Bratislava) (Suppl. 3) 19: 9-18
  10. BOHAN D.A., BOHAN A.C., GLEN D.M., SYMONDSON E.O.C., WILTSHIRE C.W. & HUGHES L. 2000: Spatial dynamics of predation by carabid beetles on slugs. J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 367-379 Go to original source...
  11. BORG C. & TOFT S. 1999: Value of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi as food for partridge Perdix perdix chicks. Wildl. Biol. 5: 55-58 Go to original source...
  12. BORG C. & TOFT S. 2000: Importance of insect prey quality for grey partridge chicks (Perdix perdix): a self-selection experiment. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 557-563 Go to original source...
  13. BRYAN K.M. & WRATTEN S.D. 1984: The responses of polyphagous predators to prey spatial heterogeneity: aggregation by carabid and staphylinid beetles to their cereal aphid prey. Ecol. Entomol. 9: 251-259 Go to original source...
  14. CHANG G.C. & KAREIVA P. 1999: The case for indigenous generalist predators in biological control. In Hawkins B.A. & Cornell H.V. (eds): Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 103-115 Go to original source...
  15. DIXON A.F.G. 2000: Insect Predator-Prey Dynamics. Ladybird Beetles & Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 257 pp
  16. EDWARDS C.A., SUNDERLAND K.D. & GEORGE K.S. 1979: Studies on polyphagous predators of cereal aphids. J. Appl. Ecol. 16: 811-823 Go to original source...
  17. EVANS E.W. & GUNTHER D.I. 2005: The link between food and reproduction in aphidophagous predators: a case study with Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 423-430 Go to original source...
  18. FAWKI S., BAK S.S. & TOFT S. 2005: Food preferences and food value in the generalist carabid beetles Pterostichus melanarius, P. versicolor and Carabus nemoralis. In LGvei G. & Toft S. (eds): European Carabidology 2003. Proceedings of the 11th European Carabidologist Meeting. DIAS Reports No. 114, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, pp. 99-109
  19. FISKER E.N. & TOFT S. 2004: Effects of chronic exposure to a toxic prey in a generalist predator. Physiol. Entomol. 29: 129-138 Go to original source...
  20. GUTIERREZ A.P. 1996: Applied Population Ecology. A SupplyDemand Approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 320 pp
  21. HARWOOD J.D., SUNDERLAND K.D. & SYMONDSON W.O.C. 2001: Living where the food is: web location by linyphiid spiders in relation to prey availability in winter wheat. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 88-99 Go to original source...
  22. HARWOOD J.D., SUNDERLAND K.D. & SYMONDSON W.O.C. 2003: Web-location by linyphiid spiders: prey-specific aggregation and foraging strategies. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 745-756 Go to original source...
  23. HARWOOD J.D., SUNDERLAND K.D. & SYMONDSON W.O.C. 2004: Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3549-3560 Go to original source...
  24. HAUGE M.S., NIELSEN F.H. & TOFT S. 1998: The influence of three cereal aphid species and mixed diet on larval survival, development and adult weight of Coccinella septempunctata. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 89: 319-322 Go to original source...
  25. HODEK I. & HONEK A. 1996: Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 464 pp Go to original source...
  26. HVAM A. & TOFT S. 2005: Effects of prey quality on the life history of a harvestman. J. Arachnol. (in press)
  27. JACKSON R.R. & LI D. 2004: One-encounter search-image formation by araneophagic spiders. Anim. Cogn. 7: 247-254 Go to original source...
  28. JORGENSEN H.B. & TOFT S. 1997a: Role of granivory and insectivory in the life cycle of the carabid beetle Amara similata. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 7-15 Go to original source...
  29. JORGENSEN H.B. & TOFT S. 1997b: Food preference, diet dependent fecundity and larval development in Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 41: 307-315
  30. KYNEB A. & TOFT S. 2004: Quality of two aphid species (Rhopalosiphum padi and Sitobion avenae) as food for the staphylinid generalist predator Tachyporus hypnorum. J. Appl. Entomol. 128: 158-163 Go to original source...
  31. LUFF M.L. 2005: Biology and ecology of immature stages of ground beetles (Carabidae). In LGvei G.L. & Toft S. (eds): European Carabidology 2003. Proceedings of the 11th European Carabidologist Meeting. DIAS Report No. 114. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, pp. 183-208
  32. MADSEN M., TERKILDSEN S. & TOFT S. 2004: Microcosm studies on control of aphids by generalist arthropod predators: effects of alternative prey. BioControl 49: 483-504 Go to original source...
  33. MAIR J. & PORT G.R. 2001a: Predation by the carabid beetles Pterostichus madidus and Nebria brevicollis is affected by size and condition of the prey Deroceras reticulatum. Agr. Forest Entomol. 3: 99-106 Go to original source...
  34. MAIR J. & PORT G.R. 2001b: Predation on the slug Deroceras reticulatum by the carabid beetles Pterostichus madidus and Nebria brevicollis in the presence of alternative prey. Agr. Forest Entomol. 3: 169-174 Go to original source...
  35. MAYNTZ D., RAUBENHEIMER D., SALOMON M., TOFT S. & SIMPSON S.J. 2005: Nutrient specific foraging in invertebrate predators. Science 307: 111-113 Go to original source...
  36. MAYNTZ D. & TOFT S. 2001: Nutrient composition of the prey's diet affects growth and survivorship of a generalist predator. Oecologia 127: 207-213 Go to original source...
  37. MONSRUD C. & TOFT S. 1999: The aggregative numerical response of polyphagous predators to aphids in cereal fields: attraction to what? Ann. Appl. Biol. 134: 265-270 Go to original source...
  38. NENTWIG W. 1980: The selective prey of linyphiid-like spiders and their space webs. Oecologia 45: 236-243 Go to original source...
  39. NENTWIG W. 1982: Zur Biologie der Schilfsackspinne Clubiona phragmitis. Entomol. Abhandl. Staatl. Mus. Tierk. Dresden 45: 183-193
  40. NIELSEN S.A. & TOFT S. 2002: Responses of a detoxification enzyme to diet quality in a wolf spider, Pardosa prativaga. In Toft S. & Scharff N. (eds): European Arachnology 2000. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp. 65-70
  41. NIELSEN S.A., HAUGE M., NIELSEN F.H. & TOFT S. 2000: Activities of glutathione S-transferase and glutathione peroxidases related to diet quality in an aphid predator, the seven-spot ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). ATLA 28: 445-449 Go to original source...
  42. NORGAARD T. 1998: Food Preference and Food Searching by the German Cockroach Blatella germanica (L.). Three Behavioural Experiments. Masters Thesis. Department of Zoology, Aarhus University, Arhus
  43. OELBERMANN K. & SCHEU S. 2002: Effects of prey type and mixed diets on survival, growth and development of a generalist predator, Pardosa lugubris (Araneae: Lycosidae). Basic Appl. Ecol. 3: 285-291 Go to original source...
  44. OFFENBERG J. 1999: Aspects of Ant-Aphid Associations and their Evolutionary Ecology. Masters Thesis. Department of Zoology, Aarhus University, Arhus
  45. PROVENCHER L. & RIECHERT S.E. 1995: Theoretical comparisons of individual success between phenotypically pure and mixed generalist predator populations. Ecol. Model. 82: 175-191 Go to original source...
  46. RIECHERT S.E. & LOCKLEY T. 1984: Spiders as biological control agents. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29: 299-320 Go to original source...
  47. RIECHERT S.E., PROVENCHER L. & LAWRENCE K. 1999: The potential of spiders to exhibit stable equilibrium point control of pests: tests of two criteria. Ecol. Appl. 9: 365-377 Go to original source...
  48. SCHMIDT M.H., LAUR A., PURTAUF T., THIES C., SCHAEFER M. & TSCHARNTKE T. 2003: Relative importance of predators and parasitoids for cereal aphid control. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 270: 1905-1909 Go to original source...
  49. SETTLE W.H., ARIAWAN H., ASTUTI E.T., CAHYANA W., HAKIMA A.L., HINDAYANA D., LESTARI A.S. & PAJARNINGSIH S. 1996: Managing tropican rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77: 1975-1988 Go to original source...
  50. SIGSGAARD L., TOFT S. & VILLAREAL S. 2001a: Diet-dependent survival, development and fecundity of the spider Atypena formosana (Oi) (Araneae: Linyphiidae) - implications for biological control in rice. Biocontr. Sci. Techn. 11: 233-244 Go to original source...
  51. SIGSGAARD L., TOFT S. & VILLAREAL S. 2001b: Diet-dependent facundity of the spiders Atypena formosana and Pardosa pseudoannulata, predators in irrigated rice. Agr. Forest Entomol. 3: 285-295. Go to original source...
  52. SUNDERLAND K. & SAMU F. 2000: Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 95: 1-13 Go to original source...
  53. SUNDERLAND K.D., TOPPING C.J., ELLIS S., LONG S., VAN DE LAAK S. & ELSE M. 1996: Reproduction and survival of linyphiid spiders, with special reference to Lepthyphantes tenuis (Blackwall). In Booij C.J.H. & den Nijs L.J.M.F. (eds): Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land. II. Survival, Reproduction and Enhancement. Aarhus University Press, Arhus, Acta Jutlandica 71-2: 81-95
  54. SUNDERLAND K.D., AXELSEN J.A., DROMPH K., FREIER B., HEMPTINNE J.-L., HOLST N.H., MOLS P.J.M., PETERSEN M.K., POWELL W., RUGGLE P., TRILTSCH H. & WINDER L. 1997: Pest control by a community of natural enemies. In Powell W. (ed.): Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land. III. The Individual, the Population and the Community. Aarhus University Press, Arhus, Acta Jutlandica 72-2: 271-326
  55. SYMONDSON W.O.C., SUNDERLAND K.D. & GREENSTONE M.H. 2002: Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 561-594 Go to original source...
  56. SORENSEN O.F. 1996: The Effects of Day Length, Temperature and Prey Type on Food Consumption by Bembidion lampros and Tachyporus hypnorum. Masters Thesis. Department of Zoology, Aarhus University, Arhus
  57. TOFT S. 1995: Value of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi as food for cereal spiders. J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 552-560 Go to original source...
  58. TOFT S. 1996: Indicators of prey quality for arthropod predators. In Booij C.J.H. & den Nijs L.J.M.F. (eds): Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land. II. Survival, Reproduction and Enhancement. Aarhus University Press, Arhus, Acta Jutlandica 71-2: 107-116
  59. TOFT S. 1997: Acquired food aversion of a wolf spider to three cereal aphids: intra- and interspecific effects. Entomophaga 42: 63-69 Go to original source...
  60. TOFT S. & BILDE T. 2002: Carabid diets and food value. In Holland J.M. (ed.): The Agroecology of Carabid Beetles. Intercept, Andover, pp. 81-110
  61. TOFT S. & NIELSEN S.A. 1997: Influence of diet quality on the respiratory metabolism of a wolf spider Pardosa prativaga. In M. Zabka (ed.): Proceedings 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology. Wyzsza Szkoaa Rolniczo-Pedagogiczna, Siedlce, Poland, pp. 301-307
  62. TOFT S. & WISE D.H. 1999a: Growth, development and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119: 191-197 Go to original source...
  63. TOFT S. & WISE D.H. 1999b: Behavioral and ecophysiological responses of a generalist predator fed single- and mixedspecies diets of different quality. Oecologia 119: 198-207 Go to original source...
  64. WALLIN H., CHIVERTON P.A., EKBOM B.S. & BORG A. 1992: Diet, fecundity and egg size in some polyphagous predatory carabid beetles. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 65: 129-140 Go to original source...
  65. WINDER L., HIRST D.J., CARTER N., WRATTEN S.D. & SOPP P.I. 1994: Estimating predation on the grain aphid Sitobion avenae by polyphagous predators. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 1-12 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.