Eur. J. Entomol. 102 (2): 225-230, 2005 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2005.035
Two types of refuge have opposite effects on the size of larval aggregations in a tropical defoliator
- Escuela de Biología, Universidad de El Salvador, Final 25 Avenida Norte, San Salvador, El Salvador
Many gregarious insects aggregate in naturally occurring refuges on their host plants. However, when refuges are filled, they may be forced to aggregate on exposed areas of the plant. This study examines the effects of refuge saturation on group size and defence against parasitism in larvae of Ammalo helops Cramer (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) that form day-resting groups on the trunks of weeping laurel, Ficus benjamina L., in El Salvador. Population densities, group sizes and parasitism were recorded on eight trees for each of four generations in 1995 and 1996. When population densities were low, all larvae were located in small groups in naturally occurring structural refuges (rotted out holes, spaces between crossing branches and under aerial roots) on the host plant. In contrast, when population densities were high and structural refuges were full, many larvae formed significantly larger groups (density refuges) on the open trunk. Between 20 and 24% of late-instar larvae were parasitized and this was inversely dependent on the size of within tree populations, in spite of populations being fragmented among structural refuges. Similarly, in a study carried out at a different location on young trees without structural refuges, parasitism of larvae was inversely related to group size. Although parasitism rates decreased with increasing group size, most larvae preferentially selected the small naturally occurring refuges, where groups were restricted to low densities. If this behaviour is an adaptive trait, I speculate that parasitism (or some other unmeasured mortality factor) is lower in naturally occurring refuges than in large open groups.
Keywords: Defence, density responses, El Salvador, Ficus, gregariousness, parasitism, refuges, Tachinidae, tiger moth, tropical defoliator
Received: September 22, 2004; Revised: February 28, 2005; Accepted: February 28, 2005; Published: May 3, 2005 Show citation
References
- AUKEMA B.H. & RAFFA K.F. 2004: Does aggregation benefit bark beetles by diluting predation? Links between a groupcolonisation strategy and the absence of emergent multiple predator effects. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 129-138
Go to original source...
- BEINGOLEA O.D. & VASQUEZ G. 1994: Notas bioecologicas sobre el "gusano peludo del ficus" en Lima. Rev. Per. Entomol. 36: 39-44
- BEINGOLEA O.D. & VASQUEZ G. 1996: Dinamica de poblaciones de Ammalo helops var. trujillaria Dognin (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Rev. Per. Entomol. 38: 29-33
- BROUAT C., GARCIA N., ANDARY C. & MCKEY D. 2001: Plant lock and ant key: pairwise coevolution of an exclusion filter in an ant-plant mutualism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 268: 2131-2141
Go to original source...
- CARRIER Y. 1992: larval dispersal from potential hosts within a population of a generalist herbivore, Choristoneura rosaceana. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 65: 11-19
Go to original source...
- CODELLA S.G. & RAFFA K.F. 1995: Contributions of female oviposition patterns and larval behavior to group defense in conifer sawflies (Hymenoptera, Diprionidae). Oecologia 103: 24-33
Go to original source...
- CORNELL J.C., STAMP N.E. & BOWERS M.D. 1987: Developmental change in aggregation, defense and escape behavior of buckmoth caterpillars, Hemileuca lucina (Saturniidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 383-388
Go to original source...
- CRESSWELL W. 1994: Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa tetanus. Anim. Behav. 47: 433-442
Go to original source...
- DAVIES J.T., ALLEN G.R. & WILLIAMS M.A. 2001: Intraplant distribution of Acalitus essigi (Acari: Eriophyoidea) on blackberries (Rubus fruticosus agg.). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25: 625-639
Go to original source...
- EBENSPERGER L.A. & WALLEM P.K. 2002: Grouping increases the ability of the social rodent, Octodon degus, to detect predators when using exposed microhabitats. Oikos 98: 491-497
Go to original source...
- ELLIOT R.D. 1985: The effects of predation risk and group-size on the anti-predator responses of nesting lapwings Vanellus vanellus. Behaviour 92: 168-187
Go to original source...
- FAILS B.S., LEWIS A.J. & BARDEN J.A. 1982: Anatomy and morphology of sun and shade-grown Ficus benjamina. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 105: 724-757
Go to original source...
- HEBBLEWHITE M. & PLETSCHER D. 2002: Effects of elk group size on predation by wolves. Can. J. Zool. 80: 800-809
Go to original source...
- HEINRICH B. 1979: Foraging strategies of caterpillars: leaf damage and possible predator avoidance strategies. Oecologia 42: 325-337.
Go to original source...
- HERRNKIND W.F., CHILDRESS M.J. & LAVALLI K.L. 2001: Cooperative defence and other benefits among exposed spiny lobsters: inferences from group size and behaviour. Mar. Freshwater Res. 52: 1113-1124
Go to original source...
- HILL R.A. & DUNBAR R.I.M. 1998: An evaluation of the roles of predation rate and predation risk as selective pressures on primate grouping behaviour. Behaviour 135: 411-430
Go to original source...
- HUNTER A.F. 2000: Gregariousness and repellent defences in the survival of phytophagous insects. Oikos 91: 213-224
Go to original source...
- IWAKUMA T. & MORIMOTO N. 1984: An analysis of larval mortality and development in relation to group size in Dictyoploca japonica (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae), with special reference to field populations. Res. Popul. Ecol. 26: 51-73
Go to original source...
- KLOK C.J. & CHOWN S.L. 1999: Assessing the benefits of aggregation: thermal biology and water relations of anomalous Emperor Moth caterpillars. Funct. Ecol. 13: 417-427
Go to original source...
- MEHLTRETER K., ROJAS P. & PALACIOS-RIOS M. 2003: Moth larvae-damaged giant leather-fern Acrostichum danaeifolium as host for secondary colonization by ants. Am. Fern. J. 93: 49-55
Go to original source...
- NEUVONEN S. 1999: Random foraging by herbivores: complex patterns may be due to plant architecture. J. Ecol. 87: 526-528
Go to original source...
- STAMP N.E. 1980: Egg deposition patterns of butterflies: why do some species cluster their eggs rather than deposit them singly? Am. Nat. 115: 367-380
Go to original source...
- STAMP N.E. 1981: Effect of group size on parasitism in a natural population of the Baltimore checkerspot Euphydryus phaeton. Oecologia 49: 201-206
Go to original source...
- STAMP N.E. 1984: Foraging behavior of tawny emperor caterpillars (Nymphalidae: Asterocampa clyton). J. Lepid. Soc. 38: 186-191
- STAMP N.E. & BOWERS M.D. 1988: Direct and indirect effects of predatory wasps (Polistes spp.: Vespidae) on gregarious caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturniidae). Oecologia 75: 619-624
Go to original source...
- TURCHIN P. & KAREIVA P. 1989: Aggregation in Aphis varians: an effective strategy for reducing predation risk. Ecology 70: 1008-1016
Go to original source...
- TYLER W.A. 1995: The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in a coral-reef fish. Anim. Behav. 49: 949-966
Go to original source...
- WANG B., FERRO D.N. & HOSMER D.W. 1997: Importance of plant size, distribution of egg masses, and weather conditions on egg parasitism in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis by Trichogramma ostriniae in sweet corn. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 83: 337-345
Go to original source...
- WANG B., FERRO D.N. & HOSMER D.W. 1999: Effectiveness of Trichogramma ostriniae and T. nubilale for controlling the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis in sweet corn. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91: 297-303
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.