Eur. J. Entomol. 101 (2): 341-344, 2004

Sex ratio of apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) - facts and artifacts

Pawel ADAMSKI
Institute of Nature Conservation PAS, Al Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Kraków, Poland; adamski@iop.krakow.pl

The adult sex ratio among the genus Parnassius is usually strongly male biased and close to 2 : 1. This paper presents the results of comparative studies, on the basis of data from wild and captive reared populations of apollo butterfly in the Pieniny National Park (Western Carpathians, Poland). Sex ratio among the wild population is strongly male biased and close to 2 : 1, whereas there was no sex ratio bias among the captive population. However, among the captive individuals caught after releasing into the wild, males significantly outnumbered females. There was a significant, sex-related, difference in activity pattern recorded in the field studies: while the majority of females were observed sitting, males were usually flying. This result suggests that the observed sex ratio shifting is at least partially an artifact caused by the more cryptic behaviour of females. The sex ratio bias was more pronounced in the wild population than in captive individuals caught after releasing into wild, which suggests that difference in detectability between the sexes is not the only reason for males outnumbering females.

Keywords: Apollo butterfly, sex ratio, mark-recapture, activity, effective population size

Received: August 20, 2003; Revised: December 10, 2003; Accepted: February 25, 2004; Published: June 25, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ADAMSKI, P. (2004). Sex ratio of apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) - facts and artifacts. EJE, 101(2), 341-344
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adamski P. & Witkowski Z. 1999a: Monitoring of local population of the apollo butterfly in the Pieniny Mountains as an example of LTER. In Bijok P. & Prus M. (eds): Long Term Ecological Research. Examples, Methods, Perspectives for Central Europe. Proc. I LTER Reg. Workshop, September 1999, M1dralin (Warsaw), Poland. US LTER Network Office, Dziekanow Leony, pp. 137-141
    2. Adamski P. & Witkowski Z. 1999b: Wing deformation in isolated Carpathian population of Parnasius apollo (Papilionidae: Parnassiinae). Nota Lepid. 22(1): 67-73
    3. Adamski P., Witkowski Z., Kosior A. & Oleo T. 2002: Ten years of restitution of Apollo butterfly in Pieniny National Park - analysis of the projeckt effectiveness. In Karwowski K. (ed.): Badania Naukowe w Pieninach 2002. [Scientific Research in the Pieniny Mts 2002.] Pieniny National Park, Kroocienko n/D, 21 pp. (in Polish)
    4. Anholt B.R. 1997: Sexual size dimorphism and sex-specific survival in adults of the damselfly Lestes disjunctus. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 127-132 Go to original source...
    5. Brommer J.E. & Fred M.S. 1999: Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecol. Entomol. 24: 125-131 Go to original source...
    6. Brook B.W., Burgman M.A. & Frankham R. 2000: Differences and congruencies between PVA packages: the importance of sex ratio for predictions of extinction risk Conserv. Ecol. 4 (1), 6. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art6 Caughley G. & Gunn A. 1996: Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 163-220 Go to original source...
    7. Dankova K. 2002: Apollo butterfly (Parnassius apollo) in the Pieniny Mts. In Karwowski K. (ed.): Badania Naukowe w Pieninach 2002. [Scientific Research in the Pieniny Mts 2002.] Pieniny National Park, Kroocienko n/D, 23 pp. (in Slovak)
    8. Fjellstad W. 1996: Flight patterns and population structure of Parnassius apollo, in a Norwegian cultural landscape. In Pulin A. (ed.): Butterfly Conservation. 2nd Int. Symp., University of Warwick, September. Book of Abstracts. University of Warwick, p. 33. Knutson R.L., Kwilosz J.R. & Grundel R. 1999: Movement patterns and population characteristics of the Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Nat. Area J. 19: 109-120
    9. Konvicka M. & Kuras T. 1999: Population structure, behaviour and selection of oviposition sites of an endangered butterfly, Parnassius mnemosynae in Litovelske Pomoravi, Czech Republic. J. Insect Conserv. 3: 211-223 Go to original source...
    10. Matter S.F. & Roland J. 2002: An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 308-316 Go to original source...
    11. Maxwell M.R. 1998: Seasonal adult sex ratio shift in the praying mantid Iris oratoria (Mantodea: Mantidae). Environ. Entomol. 27: 318-323 Go to original source...
    12. McCarthy M.A., Franklin D.C. & Burgman M.A. 1994: The importance of demographic uncertainty: an example from the helmet honeyeater Lichenostomus melanops cassidix. Biol. Conserv. 67: 135-142 Go to original source...
    13. Reed D.H., O'Grady J.J., Brook B.W., Ballou J.D. & Frankham R. 2003: Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates. Biol. Conserv. 113: 23-34 Go to original source...
    14. Schtickzelle N., Baguette M. & Le Boulenge E. 2003: Modelling insect demography from capture-recapture data: comparison between the constrained linear models and the Jolly-Seber analytical method. Can. Entomol. 135: 313-323 Go to original source...
    15. Seber G.A.F. 1982: The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters. Charles Griffin, London, pp. 161-230
    16. Stoks R. 2001a: What causes male-biased sex ratios in mature damselfly populations? Ecol. Entomol. 26: 188-197 Go to original source...
    17. Stoks R. 2001b: Male-biased sex ratios in mature damselfly populations: real or artefact? Ecol. Entomol. 26: 181-187 Go to original source...
    18. Takamura K. 1996: Changes in sex ratio of chironomid imagines from rice field waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 135: 413-421 Go to original source...
    19. Underwood D.L.A. & Shapiro A.M. 1999: A male-biased primary sex ratio and larval mortality in Eucheira socialis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 703-717
    20. West S.A. & Sheldon B.C. 2002: Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295: 1685-1688 Go to original source...
    21. White G.C., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P. & Otis D.L. 1982: Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations. Los Alamos Nat. Lab., Los Alamos, New Mexico, pp. 98-146
    22. Witkowski Z. & Adamski P. 1996: Decline and rehabilitation of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius Apollo (Linnaeus 1758) in the Pieniny National Park. In Settele J., Margules C., Poschlod P. & Henle K. (eds): Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 7-14 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content