Eur. J. Entomol. 123: 35-45, 2026 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2026.006

Marked differences in arthropod biomass and species richness between two types of Malaise trapOriginal article

Marvin KACZMAREK ORCID...1, 2, Martin H. ENTLING ORCID...2, Laura GEIB2, Christoph HOFFMANN ORCID...1
1 Julius Kühn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Plant Protection in Viticulture, Siebeldingen, Germany; e-mails: marvin.kaczmarek@julius-kuehn.de, christoph.hoffman@julius-kuehn.de
2 iES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau in der Pfalz, Germany; e-mails: martin.entling@rptu.de, laurage05@web.de

Concerns about insect decline have motivated the monitoring of terrestrial arthropods, often using Malaise traps. Since the types of Malaise trap vary widely, it is essential to understand the differences in the resulting number and composition of the arthropod catch. In this study, we compared the performance of two types of Malaise trap in capturing arthropods for biodiversity monitoring and ecological studies. We placed Bartak and SLAM traps in a paired design at increasing distances from a forest edge in vineyards in southwestern Germany. We measured arthropod biomass and used metabarcoding for species identification. Bartak traps caught 7.5 times higher biomass, but only 1.5 times more species compared to the SLAM traps. There was a significant difference in species composition, whereby highly mobile flying insect species, such as those in the order Diptera, strongly dominated the Bartak traps and ground-dwelling arthropods were better represented in SLAM traps. With increasing distance to the forest edge, species richness decreased similarly in both trap types. Our study shows that differences in trapping efficiency must be taken into account when comparing results from different, and that trap types can be chosen according to the focus of each study. Nevertheless, both trap types were able to detect the biodiversity pattern in our landscape in a similar way.

Keywords: Bartak trap, biodiversity, insect monitoring, metabarcoding, sampling method, SLAM trap, taxon richness

Received: October 30, 2025; Revised: January 19, 2026; Accepted: January 19, 2026; Published online: February 11, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
KACZMAREK, M., ENTLING, M.H., GEIB, L., & HOFFMANN, C. (2026). Marked differences in arthropod biomass and species richness between two types of Malaise trap. EJE, 123, Article 35-45. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2026.006
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    Attachments

    Download fileS1.xlsx

    File size: 80.11 kB

    References

    1. Agrarmeteorologie Rheinland-Pfalz 2024: Weatherstation Siebeldingen: Mean Values 2008-2023. URL: https://www.wetter.rlp.de/Internet/AM/NotesAM.nsf/amweb/752dce127578072cc12572eb0020c16c?OpenDocument&TableRow=2.1.2,2.6#2.1. (last accessed 19 Dec. 2024).
    2. Anderson N., Petersen S., Johnson R., Terry T., Kunzelman J., Lariviere D. & Anderson V. 2024: Pan trapping and Malaise trapping: A comparison of bee collection techniques in subalpine meadows. - Diversity 16: 536, 21 pp. Go to original source...
    3. Bartoñ K. 2020: MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference (R Package Version 1.43.17). URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html (last accessed 27 Oct. 2025).
    4. Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B. & Walker S. 2015: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. - J. Stat. Softw. 67: 1, 48 pp. Go to original source...
    5. Beck H.E., Zimmermann N.E., McVicar T.R., Vergopolan N., Berg A. & Wood E.F. 2018: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. - Sci. Data 5: 180214, 12 pp. Go to original source...
    6. Bioform 2025: Malaise-Falle Bioform nach Bartak. URL: https://www.bioform.de/shop.php?action=tree&wg=1πd=706&treeid=225 (last accessed 7 Jan. 2025).
    7. Busse A., Bässler C., Brandl R., Friess N., Hacker H., Heidrich L., Hilmers T., Merkel-Wallner G., Schmid-Egger C., Seifert L. et al. 2022: Light and Malaise traps tell different stories about the spatial variations in arthropod biomass and method-specific insect abundance. - Insect Conserv. Divers. 15: 655-665. Go to original source...
    8. Cáceres M.D. & Legendre P. 2009: Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. - Ecology 90: 3566-3574. Go to original source...
    9. Campbell J.W. & Hanula J.L. 2007: Efficiency of Malaise traps and colored pan traps for collecting flower visiting insects from three forested ecosystems. - J. Insect Conserv. 11: 399-408. Go to original source...
    10. Darling D.C. & Packer L. 1988: Effectiveness of Malaise traps in collecting Hymenoptera: The influence of trap design, mesh size, and location. - Can. Entomol. 120: 787-796. Go to original source...
    11. deWaard J.R., Levesque-Beaudin V., deWaard S.L., Ivanova N.V., McKeown J.T.A., Miskie R., Naik S., Perez K.H.J., Ratnasingham S., Sobel C.N. et al. 2019: Expedited assessment of terrestrial arthropod diversity by coupling Malaise traps with DNA barcoding. - Genome 62: 85-95. Go to original source...
    12. Fox J. & Weisberg S. 2019: An R Companion to Applied Regression. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 608 pp.
    13. Geiger M.F., Morinière J., Hausmann A., Haszprunar G., Wägele W., Hebert P.D.N. & Rulik B. 2016: Testing the Global Malaise Trap Program - How well does the current barcode reference library identify flying insects in Germany? - Biodivers. Data J. 4: e10671, 22 pp. Go to original source...
    14. Hallmann C.A., Sorg M., Jongejans E., Siepel H., Hofland N., Schwan H., Stenmans W., Müller A., Sumser H., Hörren T. et al. 2017: More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. - PLoS ONE 12(10): e0185809, 21 pp. Go to original source...
    15. Hansen J.D. 1988: Trapping methods for rangeland insects in burned and unburned sites: A comparison. - Gt. Basin Nat. 48: 383-387.
    16. Hausmann A., Segerer A.H., Greifenstein T., Knubben J., Morinière J., Bozicevic V., Doczkal D., Günter A., Ulrich W. & Habel J.C. 2020: Toward a standardized quantitative and qualitative insect monitoring scheme. - Ecol. Evol. 10: 4009-4020. Go to original source...
    17. Henderson P.A. & Southwood R. 2021: Southwood's Ecological Methods, 5th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 528 pp.
    18. Hochkirch A. 2016: The insect crisis we can't ignore. - Nature 539(7628): 141. Go to original source...
    19. Kaczmarek M., Entling M.H. & Hoffmann C. 2022: Using Malaise traps and metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment in vineyards: Effects of weather and trapping effort. - Insects 13: 507, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    20. Kaczmarek M., Entling M.H. & Hoffmann C. 2023a: Differentiating the effects of organic management, pesticide reduction, and landscape diversification for arthropod conservation in viticulture. - Biodiv. Conserv. 32: 2637-2653. Go to original source...
    21. Kaczmarek M., Gillich M., Entling M.H., Hoffmann C. & Schirmel J. 2023b: Differential responses of Orthoptera in vineyards to organic farming, pesticide reduction, and landscape heterogeneity. - J. Insect Conserv. 27: 729-741. Go to original source...
    22. Kaczmarek M., Entling M.H. & Hoffmann C. 2024: Wild bee conservation in viticulture: Effects of semi-natural habitats, organic management, and fungicide reduction. - Ecol. Evol. 14: e70378, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    23. Karlsson D., Hartop E., Forshage M., Jaschhof M. & Ronquist F. 2020: The Swedish Malaise trap project: A 15 year retrospective on a countrywide insect inventory. - Biodiv. Data J. 8: e47255, 35 pp. Go to original source...
    24. Kassambara A. 2020: ggpubr: 'ggplot2' Based Publication Ready Plots. R Package Version 0.4.0. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggpubr (last accessed 27 Oct. 2025).
    25. Korner-Nievergelt F. 2015: Bayesian Data Analysis in Ecology Using Linear Models with R, Bugs, and Stan: Including Comparisons to Frequentist Statistics. Academic Press, Amsterdam, 328 pp. Go to original source...
    26. Krahner A., Dietzsch A.C., Jütte T., Pistorius J. & Everaars J. 2024: Standardising bee sampling: A systematic review of pan trapping and associated floral surveys. - Ecol. Evol. 14: e11157, 18 pp. Go to original source...
    27. Lehmann G.U.C., Bakanov N., Behnisch M., Bourlat S.J., Brühl C.A., Eichler L., Fickel T., Geiger M.F., Gemeinholzer B., Hörren T. et al. 2021: Diversity of insects in nature protected areas (DINA): an interdisciplinary German research project. - Biodiv. Conserv. 30: 2605-2614. Go to original source...
    28. Lövei G., Ferrante M., Möller D., Möller G. & Vincze E. 2023: The need for a (non-destructive) method revolution in entomology. - Biol. Conserv. 282: 110075, 5 pp. Go to original source...
    29. Malaise R. 1937: A new insect-trap. - Entomol. Tidskr. 58: 148-160.
    30. Mangiafico S.S. 2024: rcompanion: Functions to Support Extension Education Program Evaluation. R Package Version 2.4.35. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/package=rcompanion (last accessed 27 Oct. 2025).
    31. Matthews R.W. & Matthews J.R. 1983: Malaise traps: The Townes model catches more insects. - Contrib. Am. Entomol. Inst. 20: 428-432.
    32. McCravy K.W. 2018: A review of sampling and monitoring methods for beneficial arthropods in agroecosystems. - Insects 9: 170, 27 pp. Go to original source...
    33. MegaView Science 2025: SLAM Trap - Standard. URL: https://shop.bugdorm.com/product_info.php?products_id=109 (last accessed 7 Jan. 2025).
    34. Montgomery G.A., Belitz M.W., Guralnick R.P. & Tingley M.W. 2021: Standards and best practices for monitoring and benchmarking insects. - Front. Ecol. Evol. 8: 579193, 18 pp. Go to original source...
    35. Moran M.D. 2003: Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. - Oikos 100: 403-405. Go to original source...
    36. Morinière J., Cancian de Araujo B., Lam A.W., Hausmann A., Balke M., Schmidt S., Hendrich L., Doczkal D., Fartmann B., Arvidsson S. & Haszprunar G. 2016: Species identification in Malaise trap samples by DNA barcoding based on NGS technologies and a scoring matrix. - PLoS ONE 11: e0155497, 14 pp. Go to original source...
    37. Müller J., Hothorn T., Yuan Y., Seibold S., Mitesser O., Rothacher J., Freund J., Wild C., Wolz M. & Menzel A. 2023: Weather explains the decline and rise of insect biomass over 34 years. - Nature 628: 349-354. Go to original source...
    38. Oksanen J., Simpson G.L., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O'Hara R.B., Solymos P., Stevens M.H.H., Szoecs E. et al. 2020: vegan: Community Ecology Package . R Package Version 2.5-7. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (last accessed 27 Oct. 2025).
    39. R Core Team 2023: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 4.2.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL: https://www.R-project.org/ (last accessed 27 Oct. 2025).
    40. Ratnasingham S. & Hebert P.D.N. 2013: A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the barcode index number (BIN) system. - PLoS ONE 8: e66213, 16 pp. Go to original source...
    41. Rösch V., Chavez F., Krey L., Möth S., Petroviæ B., Richart-Cervera S., Rusch A., Tiedemann M., Tolle P., Weyandt L. et al. 2024: Semi-natural habitats are key to breeding bird diversity in intensified vineyard landscapes across Europe. - Basic Appl. Ecol. 81: 66-74. Go to original source...
    42. Rosenberg Y., Bar-On Y.M., Fromm A., Ostikar M., Shoshany A., Giz O. & Milo R. 2023: The global biomass and number of terrestrial arthropods. - Sci. Adv. 9: eabq4049, 12 pp. Go to original source...
    43. RStudio Team 2023: RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Version 2023.03.0. RStudio, Boston, MA. URL: http://www.rstudio.com/ (last accessed 27 Oct. 2025).
    44. Sánchez-Bayo F. & Wyckhuys K.A. 2019: Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. - Biol. Conserv. 232: 8-27. Go to original source...
    45. Seibold S., Gossner M.M., Simons N.K., Blüthgen N., Müller J., Ambarli D., Ammer C., Bauhus J., Fischer M., Habel J.C. et al. 2019: Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. - Nature 574: 671-674. Go to original source...
    46. Skvarla M.J., Larson J.L., Fisher J.R. & Dowling A.P.G. 2021: A review of terrestrial and canopy Malaise traps. - Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 114: 27-47. Go to original source...
    47. Steinke D., Braukmann T.W.A., Manerus L., Woodhouse A. & Elbrecht V. 2021: Effects of Malaise trap spacing on species richness and composition of terrestrial arthropod bulk samples. - Metabarcod. Metagenom. 5: e59201, 8 pp. Go to original source...
    48. Townes H. 1972: A light-weight Malaise trap. - Entomol. News 83: 239-247.
    49. Uhler J., Haase P., Hoffmann L., Hothorn T., Schmidl J., Stoll S., Welti E.A.R., Buse J. & Müller J. 2022: A comparison of different Malaise trap types. - Insect Conserv. Divers. 15: 666-672. Go to original source...
    50. van Klink R., August T., Bas Y., Bodesheim P., Bonn A., Fossøy F., Høye T.T., Jongejans E., Menz M.H.M., Miraldo A. et al. 2022: Emerging technologies revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 37: 872-885. Go to original source...
    51. Welti E.A.R., Zajicek P., Frenzel M., Ayasse M., Bornholdt T., Buse J., Classen A., Dziock F., Engelmann R.A., Englmeier J. et al. 2022: Temperature drives variation in flying insect biomass across a German malaise trap network. - Insect Conserv. Divers. 15: 168-180. Go to original source...
    52. Wickham H. 2016: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 260 pp.
    53. Woodcock B.A. 2005: Pitfall trapping in ecological studies. In Leather S.R. (ed.): Insect Sampling in Forest Ecosystems. Blackwell Science, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 37-57. Go to original source...
    54. Yi Z., Jinchao F., Dayuan X., Weiguo S. & Axmacher J.C. 2012: A comparison of terrestrial arthropod sampling methods. - J. Resour. Ecol. 3: 174-182. Go to original source...
    55. Yu D.W., Ji Y., Emerson B.C., Wang X., Ye C., Yang C. & Ding Z. 2012: Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. - Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 613-623. Go to original source...
    56. Zahiri R., Lafontaine J.D., Schmidt B.C., deWaard J.R., Zakharov E.V. & Herbert P.D.N. 2014. A transcontinental challenge - A test of DNA barcode performance for 1,541 species of Canadian Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera). - PLoS ONE 9: e92797, 12 pp. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content