Eur. J. Entomol. 122: 184-188, 2025 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2025.023

Effect of local and exotic origin of Asteraceae seeds on their consumption by ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)Original article

Alois HONĚK ORCID...1, Martinková ZDENKA ORCID...1, Stano PEKÁR ORCID...2
1 Czech Agrifood Research Center, Drnovska 507, 161 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic; e-mails: alois.honek@carc.cz, zdenka.martinkova@carc.cz
2 Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic; e-mail: pekar@sci.muni.cz

Prior familiarity of carabid beetle populations with seeds of a plant species might result in a preference for locally available species, either due to evolutionary adaptation or learning. Rejection of exotic species might favor the survival of the exotic species due to enemy release. In adults of two Carabidae species, Pseudoophonus rufipes (DeGeer) and Harpalus affinis (Schrank), we investigated the consumption of seeds of the local (growing inside the distribution range of experimental carabid individuals) Asteraceae species Taraxacum officinale and Crepis biennis, and the exotic (growing outside this area) Asteraceae species Adenostyles alliariae and Homogyne alpina. We assumed that the seeds of the exotic species would be consumed less than the seeds of the local species because the seeds of exotic species are not typically found within the range of the tested carabid populations and therefore may be preferred less than the seeds of local species. The seeds of both exotic species were consumed less than the seeds of the preferred local species, T. officinale, but were consumed more than the seeds of the rejected local species, C. biennis. Both carabid species preferred A. alliariae seeds over H. alpina seeds. No difference was observed between the preferences of the mobile and well-flying species P. rufipes and the sedentary and rarely flying H. affinis. The study did not demonstrate the hypothesized preference of the two tested beetle species for the seeds of locally available plant species.

Keywords: Pseudoophonus rufipes, Harpalus affinis, enemy escape hypothesis, seed preference

Received: April 1, 2025; Revised: July 18, 2025; Accepted: July 18, 2025; Published online: August 20, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HONĚK, A., ZDENKA, M., & PEKÁR, S. (2025). Effect of local and exotic origin of Asteraceae seeds on their consumption by ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). EJE, 122, Article 184-188. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2025.023
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Blaney C.S. & Kotanen P.M. 2001: Post-dispersal losses to seed predators: an experimental comparison of native and exotic old field plants. - Can. J. Bot. 79: 284-292. Go to original source...
    2. Bogdziewicz M., Espelta J.M., Bonal R. & Abaevi V.D. 2019: Tolerance to seed predation mediated by seed size increases at lower latitudes in a Mediterranean oak. - Ann. Bot. 123: 707-714. Go to original source...
    3. Bojňanský V. & Fargašová A. 2007: Atlas of Seeds and Fruits of Central and East-European Flora. Springer, Dordrecht, 1046 pp.
    4. Castells E., Morante M., Blanco-Moreno J.M., Sans X., Vilatersana R. & Blasco-Moreno A. 2013: Reduced seed predation after invasion supports enemy release in a broad biogeographical survey. - Oecologia 173: 1397-1409. Go to original source...
    5. Cogni R. 2010: Resistance to plant invasion? A native specialist herbivore shows preference for and higher fitness on an introduced host. - Biotropica 42: 188-193. Go to original source...
    6. Fenner M. & Lee W.G. 2001: Lack of pre-dispersal seed predators in introduced Asteraceae in New Zealand. - N. Zeal. J. Ecol. 25: 95-99.
    7. Fofová H., Cavar-Zeljkovic S., Honek A., Martinkova Z., Tarkowski P. & Saska P. 2020: Which seed properties determine the preferences of carabid beetle seed predators? - Insects 11: 757, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    8. Holliday N.J. & Hagley E.A.C. 1978: Occurrence and activity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a pest management apple orchard. - Can. Entomol. 110: 113-119. Go to original source...
    9. Honek A. & Pulpan J. 1983: The flight of Carabidae (Coleoptera) to a light trap. - Věst. Čs. Spol. Zool. 47: 13-26.
    10. Honek A., Martinkova Z. & Jarosik V. 2003: Ground beetles (Carabidae) as seed predators. - Eur. J. Entomol. 100: 531-544. Go to original source...
    11. Honek A., Martinkova Z., Saska P. & Pekar S. 2007: Size and taxonomic constraints on seed consumption by adult Carabidae (Coleoptera). - Basic Appl. Ecol. 11: 1-11. Go to original source...
    12. Hornoy B., Atlan A., Tarayre M., Dugravot S. & Wink M. 2012: Alkaloid concentration of the invasive plant species Ulex europaeus in relation to geographic origin and herbivory. - Naturwissenschaften 99: 883-892. Go to original source...
    13. Hurka K. 1996: Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlin, 565 pp.
    14. Jorgensen H.B. & Toft S. 1997: Food preference, diet dependent fecundity and larval development in Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Pedobiologia 41: 307-315. Go to original source...
    15. Kubát K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J., Kaplan Z., Kirschner J. & Štěpánek J. 2002: Klíč ke květeně České republiky (Key to the Flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Praha, 928 pp.
    16. Kulkarni S.S., Dosdall L.M. & Willenborg C.J. 2015: The role of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in weed seed consumption: A review. - Weed Sci. 63: 355-376. Go to original source...
    17. Kulkarni S.S., Dosdall L.M., Spence J.R. & Willenborg C.J. 2017: Seed detection and discrimination by ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) are associated with olfactory cues. - PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170593, 11 pp. Go to original source...
    18. Moreira X., Abdala-Roberts L., Bruun H.H., Covelo F., DeFrenne P., Galmán A., Gaytán A., Jaatinen R., Pulkkinen P., TenHoopen J.P.J.G. et al. 2020: Latitudinal variation in seed predation correlates with latitudinal variation in seed defensive and nutritional traits in a widespread oak species. - Ann. Bot. 125: 881-890. Go to original source...
    19. Obenberger J. 1952: Krkonoše a jejich zvířena (The fauna of Giant Mountains). Přírodovědecké nakladatelství, Praha, 292 pp.
    20. Pekár S. & Brabec M. 2018: Generalized estimating equations: A pragmatic and flexible approach to the marginal GLM modelling of correlated data in the behavioural sciences. - Ethology 124: 86-93. Go to original source...
    21. R Core Team 2023: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, URL: https://www.R-project.org/
    22. Saska P., Honek A. & Martinkova Z. 2019: Preferences of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) for herbaceous seeds. - Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 65: 55-74. Go to original source...
    23. Slavík B. & Štěpánková J. 2004: Květena České republiky 7 (Flora of the Czech Republic 7). Academia, Praha, 767 pp.
    24. Sun X., Li H., Zhang A., Hirka A., Csoka G., Pearse I.S., Holyoak M. & Xiao Z. 2022: An intercontinental comparison of insect seed predation between introduced and native oaks. - Integrat. Zool. 17: 217-230. Go to original source...
    25. Šustek Z. 1999: Light attraction of carabid beetles and their survival in the city centre. - Biologia 54: 539-551.
    26. Wolfe L.M. 2002: Why alien invaders succeed: support for the escape-from-enemy hypothesis. - Am. Nat. 160: 705-711. Go to original source...
    27. Yan J. & Fine J.P. 2004: Estimating equations for association structures. - Statist. Med. 23: 859-880. Go to original source...
    28. Zhang J., Drummond F.A., Liebman M. & Hartke A. 1997: Phenology and dispersal of Harpalus rufipes DeGeer (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in agroecosystems in Maine. - J. Agric. Entomol. 14: 171-186.
    29. Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A. & Smith G. 2009: Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York, 574 pp. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content