Eur. J. Entomol. 120: 115-127, 2023 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2023.014

Feeding preferences of the field cricket Scapsipedus icipe (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) for different species of CommelinaOriginal article

Irakiza RUNYAMBO ORCID...1, Darius ANDIKA ORCID...1, Arnold WATAKO ORCID...1, Samuel MWONGA ORCID...2, Collins MWERESA ORCID...1
1 Department of Plant, Animal and Food Science, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST), P.O. Box 40601 Bondo, Kenya; e-mails: claudedegloire@gmail.com, oandika@yahoo.co.uk, arnoldwatako@yahoo.com, collins.mweresa@yahoo.com
2 Department of Crops, Horticulture and Soils, Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya; e-mail: smwonga@egerton.ac.ke

The field cricket, Scapsipedus icipe Hugel and Tanga (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) is edible and could be used to reduce malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa. As the demand for cricket products is increasing, there is a need to find cost-effective ways of rearing this cricket using locally available and affordable sources of food. This study evaluated the feeding preferences of the field cricket S. icipe for 11 species of dayflowers (Commelina spp.; Commelinaceae), using no-choice and multiple-choice experiments in controlled environments. Leaf feeding rates and the nutrient content and phytochemicals of the plants were determined. The ANOVA results indicate significantly higher feeding rates when offered Commelina petersii and C. forskaolii, than Commelina sp. and C. purpurea in no-choice experiments. Multiple-choice experiments ranked C. petersii as the most preferred species followed by C. forskaolii and the two reference species, C. benghalensis var. benghalensis (non-hybrid variant) and C. benghalensis (hybrid variant). The Spearman correlation and PCA revealed positive significant associations between leaf feeding and Ca and NDF content of leaves and a negative significant association between Ca and NDF. A high Ca/low NDF content was recorded for C. petersii and a low Ca/high NDF content for C. purpurea. The beta regression analysis and a biplot identified six phytochemical constituents influencing leaf feeding: phenols, alkaloids, tannins, glycosides, saponins and anthraquinones. Phenols stimulate feeding by S. icipe on C. petersii and C. forskaolii, whereas the tannins and alkaloids in Commelina sp. and C. purpurea, acted as deterrents. Nutrient content and phytochemicals are two important factors determining the suitability of species of Commelina for the field cricket S. icipe. Based on the results of this study, the leaves of C. petersii are highly recommended as a source of food for the mass rearing of this field cricket (S. icipe) and boosting entomophagy in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Keywords: Crickets, edible insects, Commelina, Commelinaceae, food security, Sub-Sahara Africa

Received: August 31, 2022; Revised: February 17, 2023; Accepted: February 17, 2023; Published online: April 6, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
RUNYAMBO, I., ANDIKA, D., WATAKO, A., MWONGA, S., & MWERESA, C. (2023). Feeding preferences of the field cricket Scapsipedus icipe (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) for different species of Commelina. EJE120, Article 115-127. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2023.014
Download citation

References

  1. AOAC 1998: Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, URL: https://www.aoac.org/resources/official-methods-of-analysis-2019/
  2. Ayieko M.A., Ogola H.J. & Ayieko I.A. 2016: Introducing rearing crickets (gryllids) at household levels: adoption, processing and nutritional values. - J. Insects Food Feed 2: 203-211. Go to original source...
  3. Bawa M., Songsermpong S., Kaewtapee C. & Chanput W. 2020: Effect of diet on the growth performance, feed conversion, and nutrient content of the house cricket. - J. Insect Sci. 20(2): 10, 10 pp. Go to original source...
  4. Bernays E.A. 1995: Effects of experience on feeding. In Chapman R.F. & de Boer G. (eds): Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp. 279-306. Go to original source...
  5. Bernays E.A. & Chapman R.E. 1994: Behavior: the process of host-plant selection. In Bernays E.A. & Chapman R.E. (eds): Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Contemporary Topics in Entomology, Vol. 2. Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 95-165. Go to original source...
  6. Brattsten L.B. 1988: Enzymic adaptations in leaf-feeding insects to host-plant allelochemicals. - J. Chem. Ecol. 14: 1919-1939. Go to original source...
  7. Budd G.D., Thomas P.E.L. & Allison J.C.S. 1979: Vegetation regeneration, depth of germination and seed dormancy in Commelina benghalensis L. - Rhod. J. Agric. Res. 17: 151-154.
  8. Bussmann R.W., Paniagua-Zambrana N.Y. & Njoroge G.N. 2021: Commelina africana L. Commelina benghalensis L. Commelinaceae. In Bussmann R.W. (ed.): Ethnobotany of the Mountain Regions of Africa. Springer, Cham, pp. 321-329. Go to original source...
  9. Capinera J.L. 2014: Host plant selection by Romalea microptera (Orthoptera: Romaleidae). - Fla Entomol. 97: 38-49. Go to original source...
  10. Chapman R.F. 1995: Chemosensory regulation of feeding. In Chapman R.F. & de Boer G. (eds): Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp. 101-136. Go to original source...
  11. Chapman R.F. 2009: Foraging and food choice in phytophagous insects. - Chem. Ecol. 1: 72-101.
  12. Chapman R.F. & de Boer G. 1995: Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding. Springer Science & Business Media, 398 pp. Go to original source...
  13. Choo Y.R., Yan A.T., Loh R.H., Chin Z.Y., Jo C.S., Lee K.E., Tan H.T.W. & Tan H.T. 2017: Can waste vegetables and weeds be used to farm crickets and grasshoppers in Singapore. - Lab. Exp. Use Veg. Weeds Farming Crickets Grasshopp. UTAR Agric. Sci. J. 3: 18-22.
  14. Cribari-Neto F. & Zeileis A. 2010: Beta regression in R. - J. Stat. Softw. 34: 1-24. Go to original source...
  15. Dethier V.G. 1954: Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. - Evolution 8: 33-54. Go to original source...
  16. Dini J. & Owen-Smith N. 1995: Condensed tannin in Eragrostis chloromelas leaves deters feeding by a generalist grasshopper. - Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 12: 49-52. Go to original source...
  17. Ecker R. & Barzilay A. 1993: Propagation of Asclepias tuberosa from short root segments. - Sci. Hortic. 56: 171-174. Go to original source...
  18. Evans W.C. 2009: Trease and Evans' Pharmacognosy. Elsevier, London, 616 pp.
  19. Ezeabara C., Chukwu E. & Okeke C. 2020: Phytochemical and proximate studies of various parts of Commelina benghalensis L. and Commelina diffusa Burm. f. - Int. J. Plant Sci. Ecol. 5: 43-46.
  20. Faden R.B. 1998: Commelinaceae. In Kubitzki K. (ed.): Flowering Plants. Monocotyledons: Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 109-128. Go to original source...
  21. Faden R.B. 2012: Flora of Tropical East Africa: Commelinaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 252 pp.
  22. Ferrari S. & Cribari-Neto F. 2004: Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. - J. Appl. Stat. 31: 799-815. Go to original source...
  23. Finch S. & Collier R.H. 2008: Host-plant selection by insects. In Capinera J.L. (eds): Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1863-1873.
  24. Getman-Pickering Z.L., Campbell A., Aflitto N., Grele A., Davis J.K. & Ugine T.A. 2020: LeafByte: A mobile application that measures leaf area and herbivory quickly and accurately. - Meth. Ecol. Evol. 11: 215-221. Go to original source...
  25. Ghosh P., Dutta A., Biswas M., Biswas S., Hazra L., Nag S.K., Sil S. & Chatterjee S. 2019: Phytomorphological, chemical and pharmacological discussions about Commelina benghalensis Linn. (Commelinaceae): A review. - Pharma Innov. J. 8: 12-18.
  26. Grabmann J. 2005: Terpenoids as plant antioxidants. - Vitam. Horm. 72: 505-535. Go to original source...
  27. GraphPad 2019: Prism Version 8.0.2 for Windows. GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, https://www.graphpad.com/updates/prism-802-release-notes
  28. Hanboonsong Y., Jamjanya T. & Durst P.B. 2013: Six-legged livestock: edible insect farming, collection and marketing in Thailand. - RAP Publ. 3: 8-21.
  29. Harborne J.B. 1973: Phenolic Compounds. Phytochemical Methods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 33-88. Go to original source...
  30. Harley K.L.S. & Thorsteinson A.J. 1967: The influence of plant chemicals on the feeding behavior, development, and survival of the two-striped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), Acrididae: Orthoptera. - Can. J. Zool. 45: 305-319. Go to original source...
  31. Horch H.W., Mito T., Popadic A., Ohuchi H. & Noji S. 2017: The Cricket as a Model Organism. Development, Regeneration, and Behavior. Springer, Tokyo, 376 pp. Go to original source...
  32. Islam M.M., Rahman M., Asaduzzaman M. & Ali M.S. 2021: Antioxidant, analgesic and CNS depressant activities of Commelina diffusa Burm. f. - Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 20: 159-166. Go to original source...
  33. Kansagara P.A. & Pandya D.J. 2019: A complete review on medicinally active herbal weed: Commelina benghalensis L. (Commelinaceae). - J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 11: 1165-1171.
  34. Kinyuru J.N. & Kipkoech C. 2018: Production and growth parameters of edible crickets: experiences from a farm in a high altitude, cooler region of Kenya. - J. Insects Food Feed 4: 247-251. Go to original source...
  35. Kirk B. & Sawyer S. 1980: Pearson's Food Composition and Analysis. Longman, Harlow, 34 pp.
  36. Kostal V. & Finch S. 1996: Preference of the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum (L.), for coloured traps: influence of sex and physiological status of the flies, trap background and experimental design. - Physiol. Entomol. 21: 123-130. Go to original source...
  37. Kuo C. & Fisher B.L. 2022: A literature review of the use of weeds and agricultural and food industry by-products to feed farmed crickets (Insecta; Orthoptera; Gryllidae). - Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5: 810421, 14 pp. Go to original source...
  38. Magara H.J.O., Tanga C.M., Ayieko M.A., Hugel S., Mohamed S.A., Khamis F.M., Salifu D., Niassy S., Sevgan S., Fiaboe K.K.M. et al. 2019: Performance of newly described native edible cricket Scapsipedus icipe (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) on various diets of relevance for farming. - J. Econ. Entomol. 112: 653-664. Go to original source...
  39. Magara H.J., Niassy S., Ayieko M.A., Mukundamago M., Egonyu J.P., Tanga C.M., Kimathi E.K., Ongere J.O., Fiaboe K.K. & Hugel S. 2021: Edible crickets (Orthoptera) around the world: distribution, nutritional value, and other benefits - a review. - Front. Nutr. 7: 537915, 23 pp. Go to original source...
  40. Matthews R.W. & Matthews J.R. 2010: Insect Behavior. Springer, Dordrecht, 527 pp. Go to original source...
  41. Miech P., Berggren Å., Lindberg J.E., Chhay T., Khieu B. & Jansson A. 2016: Growth and survival of reared Cambodian field crickets (Teleogryllus testaceus) fed weeds, agricultural and food industry by-products. - J. Insects Food Feed 2: 285-292. Go to original source...
  42. Miech P., Lindberg J.E., Berggren Å., Chhay T. & Jansson A. 2017: Apparent faecal digestibility and nitrogen retention in piglets fed whole and peeled Cambodian field cricket meal. - J. Insects Food Feed 3: 279-288. Go to original source...
  43. Miglietta P.P., De Leo F., Ruberti M. & Massari S. 2015: Mealworms for food: A water footprint perspective. - Water 7: 6190-6203. Go to original source...
  44. Mole S. & Joern A. 1994: Feeding behavior of graminivorous grasshoppers in response to host-plant extracts, alkaloids, and tannins. - J. Chem. Ecol. 20: 3097-3109. Go to original source...
  45. Murugu D.K., Onyango A.N., Ndiritu A.K., Osuga I.M., Xavier C., Nakimbugwe D. & Tanga C.M. 2021: From farm to fork: Crickets as alternative source of protein, minerals, and vitamins. - Front. Nutr. 8: 704002, 14 pp. Go to original source...
  46. Mwale T., Olweny C. & Andika D. 2022: Growth performance of the huntsman spider (Spariolenus aratta) based on different feed sources. - Int. J. Agric. Ext. 10: 47-54.
  47. Nakagaki B.J. & Defoliart G.R. 1991: Comparison of diets for mass-rearing Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) as a novelty food, and comparison of food conversion efficiency with values reported for livestock. - J. Econ. Entomol. 84: 891-896. Go to original source...
  48. Ng'ang'a J., Imathiu S., Fombong F., Borremans A., Van Campenhout L., Broeck J.V. & Kinyuru J. 2020: Can farm weeds improve the growth and microbiological quality of crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus)? - J. Insects Food Feed 6: 199-209. Go to original source...
  49. Oloo J.A., Ayieko M. & Nyongesah J.M. 2020: Acheta domesticus (cricket) feed resources among smallholder farmers in Lake Victoria region of Kenya. - Food Sci. Nutr. 8: 69-78. Go to original source...
  50. Orinda M.A., Mosi R.O., Ayieko M.A. & Amimo A. 2017: Growth performance of Common house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and field cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus) crickets fed on agro-byproducts. - J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 5: 1664-1668.
  51. Orinda M.A., Oloo J., Magara H.J. & Ayieko M. 2021: Cricket Rearing Handbook. Society for Science and Education, Stockport, UK, 77 pp. Go to original source...
  52. Panche A.N., Diwan A.D. & Chandra S.R. 2016: Flavonoids: an overview. - J. Nutr. Sci. 5: e47, 15 pp. Go to original source...
  53. Prokopy R.J., Collier R.H. & Finch S. 1983a: Leaf color used by cabbage root flies to distinguish among host plants. - Science 221: 190-192. Go to original source...
  54. Prokopy R.J., Collier R.H. & Finch S. 1983b: Visual detection of host plants by cabbage root flies. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 34: 85-89. Go to original source...
  55. Runyambo I., Andika D., Watako A., Mwonga S., Musili P. & Kirika P. 2022: Environmental and management factors that influence Commelina species in selected agro-ecological zones in Western Kenya. - Am. J. Plant Sci. 13: 884-911. Go to original source...
  56. Sanjayan K.P. & Ananthakrishnan T.N. 1987: Host preferences of some acridids (Insecta: Orthoptera) in relation to some biochemical parameters. - Proc. Anim. Sci. 96: 15-21. Go to original source...
  57. Schoonhoven L.M., Van Loon J.J. & Dicke M. 2005: Insect-Plant Biology. Oxford University Press, New York, 440 pp. Go to original source...
  58. Simpson S.J., Raubenheimer D. & Chambers P.G. 1995: The Mechanisms of nutritional homeostasis. In Chapman R.F. & de Boer G. (eds): Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp. 251-278. Go to original source...
  59. Sofowora A. 1993: Recent trends in research into African medicinal plants. - J. Ethnopharmacol. 38: 197-208. Go to original source...
  60. Stanton M.L. 1983: Spatial Patterns in the Plant Community and their Effects upon Insect Search. Academic Press, New York, 157 pp. Go to original source...
  61. StataCorp 2015: Stata Statistical Software: Release 14.2. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, URL: https://www.stata.com/stata14/
  62. Tanga C., Magara H.J., Ayieko A.M., Copeland R.S., Khamis F.M., Mohamed S.A., Ombura F.L., Niassy S., Subramanian S. & Fiaboe K.K. 2018: A new edible cricket species from Africa of the genus Scapsipedus. - Zootaxa 4486: 383-392. Go to original source...
  63. Tao J. & Li Y.O. 2018: Edible insects as a means to address global malnutrition and food insecurity issues. - Food Qual. Saf. 2: 17-26. Go to original source...
  64. Tyree W.A., Pfander W.H. & Stone P.C. 1976: Response of crickets to amount of forage in the diet. - J. Dairy Sci. 59: 164-166. Go to original source...
  65. Ugolini A. 2021: Notes on feeding, locomotor activity rhythms and orientation in the pygmy mole cricket Afrotridactylus cf. usambaricus in Kenya (Orthoptera: Tridactyloidea). - Eur. J. Entomol. 118: 210-213. Go to original source...
  66. Vaga M., Berggren Å., Pauly T. & Jansson A. 2020: Effect of red clover-only diets on house crickets (Acheta domesticus) growth and survival. - J. Insects Food Feed 6: 179-189. Go to original source...
  67. Vaga M., Berggren Å. & Jansson A. 2021: Growth, survival and development of house crickets (Acheta domesticus) fed flowering plants. - J. Insects Food Feed 7: 151-161. Go to original source...
  68. Van Huis A. & Oonincx D.G.A.B. 2017: The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. - Agron. Sustain. Dev. 37: 43, 14 pp. Go to original source...
  69. Van Huis A., Van Itterbeeck J., Klunder H., Mertens E., Halloran A., Muir G. & Vantomme P. 2013: Edible Insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 201 pp.
  70. Van Soest P.J. & Robertson J.B. 1985: Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods. Cornell University, Ithaca, 202 pp.
  71. Veenenbos M.E. & Oonincx D. 2017: Carrot supplementation does not affect house cricket performance (Acheta domesticus). - J. Insects Food Feed 3: 217-221. Go to original source...
  72. Wallace J. 2013: Biochemical Interaction between Plants and Insects. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 425 pp.
  73. Ward L.K., Hackshaw A. & Clarke R.T. 2003: Do food-plant preferences of modern families of phytophagous insects and mites reflect past evolution with plants? - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 78: 51-83. Go to original source...
  74. Webster T.M. & Grey T.L. 2008: Growth and reproduction of Benghal dayflower (Commelina benghalensis) in response to drought stress. - Weed Sci. 56: 561-566. Go to original source...
  75. Wilson A.K. 1981: Commelinaceae - A review of the distribution, biology and control of the important weeds belonging to this family. - Trop. Pest Manag. 27: 405-418. Go to original source...
  76. Yadav R.N.S. & Agarwala M. 2011: Phytochemical analysis of some medicinal plants. - J. Phytol. 3: 10-14. Go to original source...
  77. Yang Y.Y. & Kim J.G. 2016: The optimal balance between sexual and asexual reproduction in variable environments: a systematic review. - J. Ecol. Environ. 40: 12, 18 pp. Go to original source...
  78. Ying J., Jian H., Rui-yan M.A. & Ju-cai H.A.N. 2003: Host plant preferences of Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. - Insect Sci. 10: 109-114. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.