Eur. J. Entomol. 120: 81-92, 2023 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2023.011

Feeding behavior and mobility of carabid beetles in response to perceived risk of predationCarabidological special issueOriginal article

Stefanie E. DE HEIJ, Khaldoun A. ALI, Sean M. PRAGER, Christian J. WILLENBORG*
Plant Sciences Department, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; e-mails: ed294@mail.usask.ca, kaa316@mail.usask.ca, sean.prager@usask.ca, chris.willenborg@usask.ca

Carabid beetles are common inhabitants of agricultural fields where they encounter a variety of food options - including prey and weed seeds. The feeding behaviors of carabids are often influenced by the physical and chemical traits of prey and seed species, as such traits determine prey or seed species that are suitable for consumption. However, some carabid species may prey upon other carabids, complicating their role as beneficial insects due to consumptive (direct) and non-consumptive (indirect) intra-guild predation effects. The non-consumptive effects of intra-guild predation are expected to influence prey and seed foraging behaviors of carabids because those behaviors are likely to be adapted as a function of duration and intensity of predation risk. In this study, we wanted to explore the non-consumptive effects of the carabid intra-guild predator Pterosticus melanarius on mobility and feeding behavior of two carabid omnivores: Harpalus amputatus and Amara spp. Choice and no-choice feeding arenas coupled with a video system were used to study the responses of carabid beetles to the odor cues of P. melanarius. Odor cues left by P. melanarius caused H. amputatus to reduce its activity when canola seeds (Brassica napus) were offered in the feeding arenas. In contrast, P. melanarius cues did not cause H. amputatus to alter its mobility when freeze-killed fruit flies were offered in the feeding arenas, although this species did increase consumption of fruit flies under these cues. Amara spp. offered canola seeds increased their mobility and relative seed preferences when exposed to the odor cues of P. melanarius. Overall, our work shows carabid species do alter aspects of their foraging behavior under intra-guild predation risks, but this is unlikely to reduce their contributions to seed or prey biocontrol.

Keywords: Coleoptera, Carabidae, vigilance-foraging trade-off, predation risk, seed predation, prey scavenging, intra-guild interactions

Received: October 27, 2022; Revised: March 7, 2023; Accepted: March 7, 2023; Published online: March 24, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
DE HEIJ, S.E., ALI, K.A., PRAGER, S.M., & WILLENBORG, C.J. (2023). Feeding behavior and mobility of carabid beetles in response to perceived risk of predation. EJE, 120, Article 81-92. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2023.011
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ali K.A. & Willenborg C.J. 2021: The biology of seed discrimination and its role in shaping the foraging ecology of carabids: a review. - Ecol. Evol. 11: 13702-13722. Go to original source...
    2. Allema A.B., Rossing W.A.H., Van der Werf W., Heusinkveld B.G., Bukovinszky T., Steingröver E. & van Lenteren J.C. 2012: Effect of light quality on movement of Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - J. Appl. Entomol. 136: 793-800. Go to original source...
    3. Anderson M.J. 2017: Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). In Balakrishnan N., Colton T., Everitt B., Piegorsch W., Ruggeri F. & Teugels J.L. (eds): Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 1-15. Go to original source...
    4. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. & Walker S. 2015: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. - J. Stats. Softw. 67: 1-48. Go to original source...
    5. Blubaugh C.K., Widick I.V. & Kaplan I. 2017: Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels. - Oecologia 185: 1-11. Go to original source...
    6. Bohan D.A., Boursault A., Brocks D.R. & Petit S. 2011: National-scale regulation of weed seed banks by carabid predators. - J. Appl. Ecol. 48: 888-898. Go to original source...
    7. Bousquet Y. 2010: Illustrated Identification Guide to Adults and Larvae of Northeastern North American Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pensoft, Sofia, Moscow, 562 pp.
    8. Brodin T., Johansson F. & Bergsten J. 2006: Predator related oviposition site selection of aquatic beetles (Hydroporus spp.) and effects on offspring life-history. - Freshw. Biol. 51: 1277-1285. Go to original source...
    9. Brown J.S., Laundre J.W. & Grung M. 1999: The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. - J. Mammal. 80: 385-399. Go to original source...
    10. Carbonne B., Petit S., Neidel V., Foffova H., Daout E., Frei B., Shuhrovec J., Rezac M., Saska P., Wallinger C., Traugott M. & Bohan D.A. 2020: The resilience of weed seedbank regulation by carabid beetles, at continental scales, to alternative prey. - Sci. Rep. 10: 1935, 14 pp. Go to original source...
    11. Cauchoix M., Chow P.K.Y., van Horik J.O., Atance C.M., Barbeau E.J., Barragan-Jason G., Bize P., Boussard A., Buechel S.D., Cabirol A. et al. 2018: The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. - Philos. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 373: 20170281, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    12. Charalabidis A., Dechaume-Moncharmont F.X., Petit S. & Bohan D.A. 2017: Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food. - PLoS ONE 12: e0187167, 18 pp. Go to original source...
    13. Charalabidis A., Dechaume-Moncharmont F.X., Carbonne B., Bohan D.A. & Petit S. 2019: Diversity of foraging strategies and responses to predator interference in seed-eating carabid beetles. - Basic Appl. Ecol. 36: 13-24. Go to original source...
    14. Crane A.L., Demuth B.S. & Ferrari M.C.O. 2017: Experience with predators shapes learning rules in larval amphibians. - Behav. Ecol. 28: 312-318. Go to original source...
    15. Currie C.R., Spence J.R. & Niemela J.K. 1996: Competition, cannibalism and intraguild predation among ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae): a laboratory study. - Coleopt. Bull. 50: 135-148.
    16. Davey J.S., Vaughan I.P., King R.A., Bell J.R., Bohan D.A., Brufod M.W., Holland J.M. & Symondson W.OC. 2013: Intraguild predation in winter wheat: prey choice by a common epigeal carabid consuming spider. - J. Appl. Ecol. 50: 271-279. Go to original source...
    17. Davis A.S. & Raghu S. 2010: Weighing abiotic and biotic influences on weed seed consumption. - Weed Res. 50: 402-412. Go to original source...
    18. De Heij S.E. & Willenborg C.J. 2020: Connected carabids: network interactions and their impact on biocontrol by carabid beetles. - Bioscience 70: 490-500. Go to original source...
    19. De Heij S.E., Benaragama D.I. & Willenborg CJ. 2022: Carabid activity-density and community composition, and their impact on seed predation in pulse crops. - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 326: 107807, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    20. Den Boer P. 1986: Facts, hypotheses and models on the part played by food in the dynamics of carabid populations. In Den Boer P., Grüm L. & Szyszko J. (eds): Feeding Behaviour and Accessibility of Food for Carabid Beetles. Warsaw Agricultural University Press, Warsaw, pp. 81-96.
    21. Des Roches S., Robinson R.R., Kinnison M.T. & Palkovacs E.P. 2021: The legacy of predator threat shapes prey foraging behaviour. - Oecologia 198: 79-89. Go to original source...
    22. Dicke M. & Grostal P. 2001: Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32: 1-23. Go to original source...
    23. Donelan S.C., Grabowski J.H. & Trussell G.C. 2017: Refuge quality impacts the strength of nonconsumptive effects on prey. - Ecology 98: 403-411. Go to original source...
    24. Ferrante M., Barone G. & Lövei G.L. 2017: The carabid Pterostichus melanarius uses chemical cues for opportunistic predation and saprophagy but not for finding healthy prey. - BioControl 62: 741-747. Go to original source...
    25. Ferrari M.C.O., Sih A. & Chivers D.P. 2009: The paradox of risk allocation: a review and prospectus. - Anim. Behav. 78: 579-585. Go to original source...
    26. Finke D.L. & Denno R.F. 2002: Intraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: Implications for prey suppression. - Ecology 83: 643-652. Go to original source...
    27. Foltan P., Sheppard S., Konvicka M. & W.O.C. Symondson W.O.C. 2005: The significance of facultative scavenging in generalist predator nutrition: detecting decayed prey in the guts of predators using PCR. - Mol. Ecol. 14: 4147-4158. Go to original source...
    28. Frank S.D., Shrewsbury P.M. & Denno R.F. 2010: Effects of alternative food on cannibalism and herbivore suppression by carabid larvae. - Ecol. Entomol. 35: 61-68. Go to original source...
    29. Frank S.D., Shrewsbury P.M. & Denno R.F. 2011: Plant versus prey resources: Influence on omnivore behavior and herbivore suppression. - Biol. Contr. 57: 229-235. Go to original source...
    30. Giglio A., Vommaro M.L., Brandmayr P. & Talarico F. 2021: Pygidial glands in Carabidae, an overview of morphology and chemical secretion. - Life 11: 562, 22 pp. Go to original source...
    31. Glinwood R., Ahmed E., Ovarfordt E. & Ninkovic V. 2011: Olfactory learning of plant genotypes by a polyphagous predator. - Oecologia 166: 637-647. Go to original source...
    32. Golab M.J., Sniegula S., Antoł A. & Brodin T. 2021: Adult insect personality in the wild - Calopteryx splendens as a model for field studies. - Ecol. Evol. 11: 18467-18476. Go to original source...
    33. Guy A.G., Bohan D.A., Powers S.J. & Reynolds A.M. 2008: Avoidance of conspecific odour by carabid beetles: a mechanism for the emergence of scale-free searching patterns. - Anim. Behav. 76: 585-591. Go to original source...
    34. Harris C., Liedtke J., Drees C. & Schuett W. 2020: Exploratory behaviour is not related to associative learning ability in the carabid beetle Nebria brevicollis. - Behav. Process. 180: 104224, 7 pp. Go to original source...
    35. Harrison S. & Gallandt E.R. 2012: Behavioural studies of Harpalus rufipes De Geer: an important weed seed predator in Northeastern US agroecosystems. - Int. J. Ecol. 2012: 846546, 6 pp. Go to original source...
    36. Hermann S.L. & Landis D.A. 2007: Scaling up our understanding on non-consumptive effects in insect systems. - Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 14: 54-60. Go to original source...
    37. Hermann S.L. & Thaler J.S. 2014: Prey perception of predation risk: volatile chemical cues mediate non‑consumptive effects of a predator on a herbivorous insect. - Oecologia 176: 669-676. Go to original source...
    38. Hermann S.L. & Thaler J.S. 2021: Chemical ecology and predator-prey interactions: understanding the role of chemistry on complex, trophic relationships in a changing world. - J. Chem. Ecol. 47: 819-821. Go to original source...
    39. Hervé M. 2021: RVAideMemoire: Testing and Plotting Procedures for Biostatistics. R Package Version 0.9-79. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RVAideMemoire/index.html
    40. Kaplan I. & Thaler J.S. 2010: Plant resistance attenuates the consumptive and non-consumptive impacts of predators on prey. - Oikos 119: 1105-1113. Go to original source...
    41. Kassambara A. 2021: Rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
    42. Kulkarni S.S., Dosdall L.M. & Willenborg C.J. 2015a: The role of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in weed seed consumption: a review. - Weed Sci. 63: 335-376. Go to original source...
    43. Kulkarni S.S., Dosdall L.M., Spence J.R. & Willenborg C.J. 2015b: Depth of seed burial and gender influence weed seed predation by three species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Weed Sci. 63: 910-915. Go to original source...
    44. Kulkarni S.S., Dosdall L.M., Spence J.R. & Willenborg C.J. 2017: Field density and distribution of weed are associated with spatial dynamics of omnivorous ground beetles (Coleo­ptera: Carabidae). - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 236: 134-141. Go to original source...
    45. Kulkarni S.S., Dosdall L.M., Spence J.R. & Willenborg C.J. 2016: Brassicaceous weed seed predation by ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Weed Sci. 64: 294-302. Go to original source...
    46. Labaude S., O'Donnell N. & Griffin C.T. 2018: Description of a personality syndrome in a common and invasive ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Sci. Rep. 8: 17479, 8 pp. Go to original source...
    47. Larochelle A. & Larieviere M.C. 2003: A Natural History of the Ground-Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of America North of Mexico. Pensoft Series Faunistica 27, Sofia, Moscow, 583 pp.
    48. Leeson J. & Beckie H. 2014: Saskatchewan Weed Survey. Report no. 20130251, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Sakatoon, 57 pp.
    49. Legendre P. & Anderson M.J. 1999: Distance-based redundancy analysis: Testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. - Ecol. Monogr. 69: 1-24. Go to original source...
    50. Legendre P. & Gallagher E.D. 2001: Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. - Oecologia 129: 271-280. Go to original source...
    51. Lima S.L. & Bednekoff P.A. 1999: Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. - Am. Nat. 153: 649-659. Go to original source...
    52. Lima S.L. & Dill L.M. 1990: Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. - Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640. Go to original source...
    53. Lindroth C.H. 1969: The Ground-Beetles of Canada and Alaska. Parts 1-6. Berlingska Boktryckeriet, Lund, 1192 pp.
    54. Lövei G.L. & Sunderland K.D. 1996: Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 231-256. Go to original source...
    55. Luff M.L. 1978: Diel activity patterns of some field Carabidae. - Ecol. Entomol. 3: 53-62. Go to original source...
    56. Lundgren J.G. 2009: Relationships of Natural Enemies and Non-prey Foods. Progress in Biological Control. Vol. 7. Springer Dordrecht, 490 pp. Go to original source...
    57. Magura T., Mizser S., Horváth R., Nagy D.D., Tóth M., Csicsek R. & Lövei G.L. 2021: Are there personality differences between rural vs. urban-living individuals of a specialist ground beetle, Carabus convexus? - Insects 12: 646, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    58. Noldus L.P.J.J., Spink A.J. & Tegelenbosch R.A.J. 2001: EthoVision: A versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments. - Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 33: 398-414. Go to original source...
    59. Noldus L.P.J.J., Spink A.J. & Tegelenbosch R.A.J. 2002: Computerised video tracking, movement analysis and behaviour recognition in insects. - Comput. Electron. Agric. 35: 201-227. Go to original source...
    60. Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., McGlinn D., Minchin P.R., O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Henry M., Stevens H., Szoecs E. & Wagner H. 2018: Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package Version 2.5-2. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vega
    61. Pessarrodona A., Boada J., Pages J.F., Arthur R. & Alcoverro T. 2019: Consumptive and non-consumptive effects of predators vary with the ontogeny of their prey. - Ecology 100: e02649, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    62. Petit S., Boursauld A. & Bohan D.A. 2014: Weed seed choice by carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae): linking field measurements with laboratory diet assessments. - Eur. J. Entomol. 111: 615-620. Go to original source...
    63. Pitt W.C. 1999: Effects of multiple vertebrate predators on grasshopper habitat selection: trade-offs due to predation risk, foraging, and thermoregulation. - Evol. Ecol. 13: 499-515. Go to original source...
    64. Plotkin H.C. 1979: Learning in a carabid beetle (Pterostichus melanarius). - Anim. Behav. 27: 567-575. Go to original source...
    65. Preisser E.L. & Orrock J.L. 2012: The allometry of fear: interspecific relationships between body size and response to predation risk. - Ecosphere 3: 1-7. Go to original source...
    66. Preisser E.L., Bolnick D.I. & Benard M.F. 2005: Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predatorprey interactions. - Ecology 86: 501-509. Go to original source...
    67. Preisser E.L., Orrock J.L. & Schmitz O.J. 2007: Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions. - Ecology 88: 2744-2751. Go to original source...
    68. R Core Team 2021: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, URL: http://www.R-project.org
    69. Rivers A., Mullen C., Wallace J. & Barbercheck M. 2017: Cover crop-based reduced tillage system influences Carabidae (Coleoptera) activity, diversity and trophic group during transition to organic production. - Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 32: 538-551. Go to original source...
    70. Rok A.M. & Renner T. 2018: Carabidae semiochemistry: current and future directions. - J. Chem. Ecol. 44: 1069-1082. Go to original source...
    71. Sasakawa K. 2010: Field observations of climbing behavior and seed predation by adult ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a lowland area of the temperate zone. - Environ. Entomol. 39: 1554-1560. Go to original source...
    72. Saska P., Van der Werf W., De Vries E. & Westerman P.R. 2008: Spatial and temporal patterns of carabid activity-density in cereals do not explain levels of consumption on weed seeds. - Bull. Entomol. Res. 98: 169-181. Go to original source...
    73. Scharf I. 2016: The multifaceted effects of starvation on arthropod behaviour. - Anim. Behav. 119: 37-48. Go to original source...
    74. Schuett W., Dall S.R.X., Baeumer J., Kloesener M.H., Nakagawa S., Beinlich F. & Eggers T. 2011: 'Personality' variation in a clonal insect: The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. - Dev. Psychobiol. 53: 631-640. Go to original source...
    75. Searle K.R., Stokes C.J. & Gordon I.J. 2008: When foraging and fear meet: using foraging hierarchies to inform assessments of landscapes of fear. - Behav. Ecol. 19: 475-482. Go to original source...
    76. Shearin A.F., Reberg-Horton C.R. & Gallandt E.R. 2008: Cover crop effects on the activity-density of the weed seed predator Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Weed Sci. 56: 442-450. Go to original source...
    77. Sih A., Bell A. & Johnson J.C. 2004: Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 372-378. Go to original source...
    78. Snyder W.E. & Ives A.R. 2001: Generalist predators disrupt biological control by a specialist parasitoid. - Ecology 82: 705-716. Go to original source...
    79. Snyder W.E. & Wise D.H. 1999: Predator interference and the establishment of generalist predator populations for biocontrol. - Biol. Contr. 15: 283-292. Go to original source...
    80. Storm J.J. & Lima S.L. 2008: Predator-naive fall field crickets respond to the chemical cues of wolf spiders. - Can. J. Zool. 86: 1259-1263. Go to original source...
    81. Suenaga H. & Hamamura T. 1998: Laboratory evaluation of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as predators of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) larvae. - Environ. Entomol. 27: 767-772. Go to original source...
    82. Symondson W.O.C., Glen D.M., Ives A.R., Langdon C.J. & Wiltshire C.W. 2002a: Dynamics of the relationship between a generalist predator and slugs over five years. - Ecology 83: 137-147. Go to original source...
    83. Symondson W.O.C., Sunderland K.D. & Greenstone M.H. 2002b: Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 561-594. Go to original source...
    84. Szyszko J., Gryuntal S. & Schwerk A. 2004: Differences in locomotory activity between male and female Carabus hortensis (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a pine forest and a beech forest in relation to feeding state. - Environ. Entomol. 33: 1442-1446. Go to original source...
    85. Toft S. & Bilde T. 2002: Carabid diets and food value. In Holland J.M. (ed.): The Agroecology of Carabid Beetles. Intercept, Andover, pp. 81-110.
    86. Wallin H. & Ekbom B.S. 1988: Movements of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) inhabiting cereal fields: a field tracing study. - Oecologia 77: 39-43. Go to original source...
    87. Wallin H. & Ekbom B. 1994: Influence of hunger level and prey densities on movement patterns in three species of Pterostichus beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Environ. Entomol. 23: 1171-1181. Go to original source...
    88. Wickham H. 2016: Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York, 182 pp. Go to original source...
    89. Wilder S.M. & Rypstra A.L. 2004: Chemical cues from an introduced predator (Mantodea, Mantidae) reduce the movement and foraging of a native wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) in the laboratory. - Environ. Entomol. 33: 1032-1036. Go to original source...
    90. Winder L., Alexander C.J., Holland J.M., Woolley C. & Perry J.N. 2001: Modelling the dynamic spatio-temporal response of predators to transient prey patches in the field. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 568-576. Go to original source...
    91. Yarwood E., Drees C., Niven J.E. & Schuett W. 2021: Sex-specific covariance between metabolic rate, behaviour and morphology in the ground beetle Carabus hortensis. - PeerJ. 9: e12455, 19 pp. Go to original source...
    92. Zalewski M., Dudek-Godeau D., Godeau J.F., Kujawa K., Sien­kiewicz P., Tiunov A.V. & Ulrich W. 2016: Trophic generalism at the population level in ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). - Can. Entomol. 148: 284-293. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content