Eur. J. Entomol. 119: 159-169, 2022 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2022.018

Distribution of butterflies (Lepidoptera) in a successional mosaic of Mediterranean mountain habitatsOriginal article

Jesús SÁNCHEZ-DÁVILA ORCID..., José A. MOLINA ORCID..., Francisco J. CABRERO-SAÑUDO ORCID...
Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, c/José Antonio Novais, 12, 28040-Madrid, Spain; e-mails: jesus.sanchez.davila0@gmail.com, jmabril@farm.ucm.es, fjcabrero@bio.ucm.es

The distribution of butterflies was analysed in a mosaic of different types of habitats in a typical Ibero-Supramediterranean plant landscape. This mosaic landscape is composed of oak forests (Quercus pyrenaica) and their corresponding shrub and grassland successional communities. The observed patterns were based on butterfly-flower interactions in two consecutive years (2017-2018) recorded in different habitats. The results of the nestedness analysis indicated that the same butterfly community exploits all of the successional plant-communities, but some differences due to the availability of flowers. The foraging for nectar sources was mostly restricted to a few flowering plants: Rubus ulmifolius, Carduus carpetanus, Thymus pulegioides and Dianthus deltoides. Some butterflies changed their flower-visiting patterns over the two years studied. The distribution of butterflies was strongly linked to the distribution of their preferred nectar sources and changes in the use of these sources modified habitat use. The area of Rubus shrubland is a small but highly used habitat in this area, given the presence of Rubus ulmifolius, a plant species with high coverage and abundance of nectar, makes this area much better for foraging than other habitats. The Cytisus and Rubus shrublands were used more than grassland, indicating that seral habitats can be more valuable than traditional open grassland and forest habitats for butterflies.

Keywords: Flower visiting, preference, availability, seral, conservation

Received: March 2, 2021; Revised: April 5, 2022; Accepted: April 5, 2022; Published online: May 16, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SÁNCHEZ-DÁVILA, J., MOLINA, J.A., & CABRERO-SAÑUDO, F.J. (2022). Distribution of butterflies (Lepidoptera) in a successional mosaic of Mediterranean mountain habitats. EJE, 119, Article 159-169. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2022.018
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Atmar W. & Patterson B.D. 1995: The Nestedness Temperature Calculator: A Visual Basic Program, Including 294 Presence-absence Matrices. AICS Research, Inc., University Park, New Mexico, and The Field Museum, Chicago, URL: http://aics-research.com/nestedness/tempcalc.html.
    2. Atmar W. & Patterson B.D. 2000: Analyzing species composition in fragments. Isolated vertebrate communities in the tropics. - Bonn. Zool. Monogr. 46: 9-24.
    3. Austin M.P. 1980: Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. - Vegetatio 42: 11-21. Go to original source...
    4. Balmer O. & Erhardt A. 2000: Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for Central European butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. - Conserv. Biol. 14: 746-757. Go to original source...
    5. Bobo K.S., Waltert M., Fermon H., Njokagbor J. & Mühlenberg M. 2006: From forest to farmland: butterfly diversity and habitat associations along a gradient of forest conversion in southwestern Cameroon. - J. Insect Conserv. 10: 29-42. Go to original source...
    6. Bubová T., Vrabec V., Kulma M. & Nowicki P. 2015: Land management impacts on European butterflies of conservation concern: a review. - J. Insect Conserv. 19: 805-821. Go to original source...
    7. Campoamor J.N. & Molina J.A. 2001: Diversity of Tricholomataceae along a Mediterranean altitudinal gradient. - Cryptogam. Mycol. 22: 175-184. Go to original source...
    8. Chytrý M. & Otýpková Z. 2003: Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. - J. Veg. Sci. 14: 563-570. Go to original source...
    9. Clarke K.R. & Gorley R.N. 2006: Primer-e v6: User Manual/Tutorial. Primer-e, Plymouth, UK, 190 pp.
    10. Colom P., Traveset A. & Stefanescu C. 2021: Long-term effects of abandonment and restoration of Mediterranean meadows on butterfly-plant interactions. - J. Insect Conserv. 25: 383-393. Go to original source...
    11. Colwell R.K. 2000: EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples (Software, Version 6). URL: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
    12. Corbet S.A. 2000: Butterfly nectaring flowers, butterfly morphology and flower form. - Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96: 289-298. Go to original source...
    13. Dennis R.L.H. 2004: Just how important are structural elements as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with priority conservation status. - J. Insect Conserv. 8: 37-45. Go to original source...
    14. Dennis R.L.H, Shreeve T.G & Van Dyck H. 2003: Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. - Oikos 102: 417-426. Go to original source...
    15. Dobson A. 1999: An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall / CRC, London, 240 pp.
    16. Ezzeddine M. & Matter S.F. 2008: Nectar flower use and electivity by butterflies in sub-alpine meadows. - J. Lepid. Soc. 62: 138-142.
    17. Fahrig L. 2017: Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48: 1-23. Go to original source...
    18. Fartmann T., Muller C. & Poniatowski D. 2013: Effects of coppicing on butterfly communities of woodlands. - Biol. Conserv. 159: 396-404. Go to original source...
    19. Franzen M. & Ranius T. 2004: Occurrence patterns of butterflies (Rhopalocera) in semi-natural pastures in southeastern Sweden. - J. Nat. Conserv. 12: 121-135. Go to original source...
    20. Fleishman E. & Murphy D.D. 1999: Patterns and processes of nestedness in a Great Basin butterfly community. - Oecologia 119: 133-139. Go to original source...
    21. Gómez de Aizpúrua C. 1987: Atlas provisional de los lepidópteros de Madrid (Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea y Zygenoitka). Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, 326 pp.
    22. Gotelli N.J. & Colwell R.K. 2001: Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. - Ecol. Lett. 4: 379-391. Go to original source...
    23. Goulson D., Ollerton J. & Sluman C. 1997: Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus: when to switch? - Anim. Behav. 53: 1009-1016. Go to original source...
    24. Grill A., Knoflach B., Cleary D.F.R. & Kati V. 2005: Butterfly, spider, and plant communities in different landuse types in Sardinia, Italy. - Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 1281-1300. Go to original source...
    25. Holl K.D. 1995: Nectar resources and their influence on butterfly communities on reclaimed coal surface mines. - Restor. Ecol. 3: 76-85. Go to original source...
    26. Hyams D.G. 2010: CurveExpert Basic Software, Release 1.4. URL: http://www.curveexpert.net.
    27. Jennersten O. 1984: Flower visitation and pollination efficiency of some North European butterflies. - Oecologia 63: 80-89. Go to original source...
    28. Kitahara M., Yumoto M. & Kobayashi T. 2008: Relationship of butterfly diversity with nectar plant species richness in and around the Aokigahara primary woodland of Mount Fuji, central Japan. - Biodiv. Conserv. 17: 2713-2734. Go to original source...
    29. Krämer B., Poniatowski D. & Fartmann T. 2012: Effects of landscape and habitat quality on butterfly communities in pre-alpine calcareous grasslands. - Biol. Conserv. 152: 253-261. Go to original source...
    30. Lebeau J., Wesselingh R.A. & Van Dyck H. 2017: Flower use of the butterfly Maniola jurtina in nectar-rich and nectar-poor grasslands: a nectar generalist with a strong preference? - Insect Conserv. Divers. 10: 257-270. Go to original source...
    31. Lien V.V. & Yuan D. 2003: The differences of butterfly (Lepido­ptera, Papilionidae) communities in habitats with various degrees of disturbance and altitudes in tropical forests of Vietnam. - Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 1099-1111. Go to original source...
    32. Lobo J.M. 2001: Spatial and environmental determinants of vascular plant species richness distribution in the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 233-253. Go to original source...
    33. Loertsher M., Erhardt A. & Zettel J. 1995: Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaic-like habitat: the role of nectar sources. - Ecography 18: 15-26. Go to original source...
    34. Marini L., Fontana P., Battisti A. & Gaston K.J. 2009: Agricultural management, vegetation traits and landscape drive orthopteran and butterfly diversity in a grassland-forest mosaic: a multi-scale approach. - Insect Conserv. Div. 2: 213-220. Go to original source...
    35. Martín-Piera F., Veiga C.M. & Lobo J.M. 1986: Contribución al conocimiento de los Scarabaeoidea (Col.) coprófagos del macizo central de Guadarrama. - Eos / Revta Esp. Entomol. 62: 103-123.
    36. McCullagh P. & Nelder J.A. 1989: Generalized Linear Models.Chapman & Hall, London, 532 pp. Go to original source...
    37. Molina Abril J.A. 1994: Resumen sintaxonómico de las comunidades vegetales de Francia y España hasta el rango de alianza. - Colloq. Phytosoc. 22: 55-110.
    38. Montagud S. & García-Alama J.A. 2010: Mariposas diurnas de la Comunitat Valenciana (Papilionidae & Hesperioidea). Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, 471 pp.
    39. Nwokwu G.N. & Sanderson R. 2009: Comparative study of ecological survey techniques on invertebrate. - C. J. Agric. Sci. 3: 15-20.
    40. Öckinger E., Eriksson A.K. & Smith H.G. 2006: Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants. - Biol. Conserv. 133: 291-300. Go to original source...
    41. Oliver T., Roy D.B., Hill J.K., Brereton T. & Thomas C.D. 2010: Heterogeneous landscapes promote population stability. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 473-484. Go to original source...
    42. Parker I.M. 1997: Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius, an invasive exotic shrub. - Ecology 788: 1457-1470. Go to original source...
    43. Parker I.M., Engel A., Haubensak K.A. & Goodell K. 2002: Pollination of Cytisus scoparius and Genista monspessulana, two invasive shrubs in California. - Madroño 49: 25-32.
    44. Pollard E. 1988: Temperature, rainfall and butterfly numbers. - J. Appl. Ecol. 60: 737-748. Go to original source...
    45. Pollard E. & Yates T.J. 1993: Aims and methods of monitoring. In Goldsmith F.B. & Duffey E. (eds): Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 26-30.
    46. Pöyry J., Paukkunen J., Heliölä J. & Kuussaari M. 2009: Relative contribution of local and regional factors to species richness and total density of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands. - Oecologia 160: 577-587. Go to original source...
    47. QGIS Development Team 2014: QGIS Geographic Information System Ver. 10. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. URL: http://qgis.osgeo.org/.
    48. Rey Benayas J.M. & de la Montaña E. 2003: Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. - Biol. Conserv. 114: 357-370. Go to original source...
    49. Rivas-Martínez S. & Canto P. 1987: Datos sobre la vegetación de las Sierras de Guadarrama y Malagón. - Lazaroa 7: 235-257.
    50. Rivas-Martínez S., Penas A., Díaz T.E. & Fernández F. (eds): 2011: Mapas de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España (Memoria del mapa de vegetación potencial de España). Parte II. - Itinera Geobot. 18: 5-800.
    51. Rivas-Martínez S., Penas A., Díaz-González T., Del Río S., Cantó P., Herrero L., Pinto Gomes C. & Costa J.C. 2014: Biogeography of Spain and Portugal. Preliminary typological synopsis. - Int. J. Geobot. Res. 4: 1-64.
    52. Sánchez-Mata D., Gavilán R.G. & de la Fuente V. 2017: The Sistema Central (Central Range). In Loidi J. (ed.): The Vegetation of the Iberian Peninsula. Plant and Vegetation, 12. Springer, Cham, pp. 549-588. Go to original source...
    53. Schmitt T. 2003: Influence of forest and grassland management on the diversity and conservation of butterflies and burnet moths (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Hesperiidae, Zygaenidae). - Anim. Biodiv. Conserv. 26: 51-61.
    54. Severns P.M., Boldt L. & Villegas S. 2006: Conserving a wetland butterfly: quantifying early lifestage survival through seasonal flooding adult nectar and habitat preference. - J. Insect Conserv. 10: 361-370. Go to original source...
    55. Sharp M.A., Parks D.R. & Ehrlich P.R. 1974: Plant resources and butterfly habitat selection. - Ecology 55: 870-875. Go to original source...
    56. Slancarova J., Benes J., Kristynek M., Kepka P. & Konvicka M. 2014: Does the surrounding landscape heterogeneity affect the butterflies of insular grassland reserves? A contrast between composition and configuration. - J. Insect Conserv. 18: 1-12. Go to original source...
    57. Slancarova J., Vrba P., Platek M., Zapletal M., Spitzer L. & Konvicka M. 2015: Co-occurrence of three Aristolochia-feeding Papilionids (Archon apollinus, Zerynthia polyxena and Zerynthia cerisy) in Greek Thrace. - J. Nat. Hist. 49: 1-24. Go to original source...
    58. Slancarova J., Bartonova A. Zapletal M., Kotilinek M., Fric Z.F., Micevski N., Kati V. & Konvicka M. 2016: Life history traits reflect changes in Mediterranean butterfly communities due to forest encroachment. - Plos One 11(3): e0152026, 18 pp. Go to original source...
    59. Söderström B., Svensson B., Vessby K. & Glimskär A. 2001: Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. - Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 1839-1863. Go to original source...
    60. Statsoft Inc. 2011: Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), Version 10. URL: www.statsoft.com.
    61. Stefanescu C., Peñuelas J. & Filella I. 2009: Rapid changes in butterfly communities following the abandonment of grasslands: a case study. - Insect Conserv. Div. 2: 261-269. Go to original source...
    62. Stefanescu C., Torre I., Jubany J. & Páramo F. 2011: Recent trends in butterfly populations from north-east Spain and Andorra in the light of habitat and climate change. - J. Insect Conserv. 15: 83-93. Go to original source...
    63. Steffan-Dewenter I. & Tscharntke T. 1997: Early succession of butterfly and plant communities on set-aside fields. - Oecologia 109: 294-302. Go to original source...
    64. Szigeti V., Kőrösi Á., Harnos A. & Kis J. 2018: Temporal changes in floral resource availability and flower visitation in a butterfly. - Arthr.-Plant Interact. 12: 177-189. Go to original source...
    65. Ubach A., Páramo F., Gutiérrez C. & Stefanescu C. 2020: Vegetation encroachment drives changes in the composition of butterfly assemblages and species loss in Mediterranean ecosystems. - Insect Conserv. Div. 13: 151-161. Go to original source...
    66. van Halder I., Barbaro L. & Jactel H. 2011: Conserving butterflies in fragmented plantation forests: Are edge and interior habitats equally important? - J. Insect Conserv. 15: 591-601. Go to original source...
    67. van Swaay C. 2002: The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. - Biol. Conserv. 104: 315-318. Go to original source...
    68. van Swaay C., Warren M., Lois G. 2006: Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. - J. Insect Conserv. 10: 189-209. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content