Eur. J. Entomol. 106 (2): 241-252, 2009 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2009.032

Light intensity affects spatial distribution of Heteroptera in deciduous forests

Martin M. GOSSNER
Institute of Ecology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743 Jena, Germany; e-mail: martin.gossner@uni-jena.de

Studies on the effect of varying light intensity on the spatial distribution of flying insect communities are rare, particularly in complex ecosystems like forests. The horizontal and vertical distribution of Heteroptera was studied at different scales in a large deciduous forest area, the "Steigerwald", in southern Germany. Diversity was affected by (1) vertical position: it was significantly higher near the ground than in the canopy of beech-dominated forests but similar in oak-dominated forests; within the canopy of beech-dominated forests, diversity was significantly higher in the upper than in the lower canopy of intermixed oak trees but similar in beech trees; (2) canopy cover, but in oak forests the response depended on the vertical position: increasing significantly close to the forest floor with decreasing canopy cover, but showing an opposite trend in the canopy; so that in sparse stands (little canopy cover) diversity was significantly higher near the ground, whereas where the forest canopy was medium or dense diversity was higher in the canopy. Moreover, community composition of Heteroptera near the ground differed from that in the canopy in both forest types and near the ground between stands in oak-dominated forest that had canopies of different densities. Results clearly indicate that light intensity is an important direct or indirect factor structuring Heteroptera communities. While in the canopy differences in leaf quality and microhabitats might be important, near the forest floor it is more likely to be the diversity of herbaceous plants.

Keywords: Light regime, diversity, Heteroptera, community structure, vertical and horizontal stratification, nemoral fauna

Received: November 24, 2008; Revised: January 5, 2009; Accepted: January 5, 2009; Published: May 20, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
GOSSNER, M.M. (2009). Light intensity affects spatial distribution of Heteroptera in deciduous forests. EJE, 106(2), 241-252. doi: 10.14411/eje.2009.032
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AAVIK T., JOGAR U., LIIRA J., TULVA I. & ZOBEL M. 2008: Plant diversity in a calcareous wooded meadow - the significance of management continuity. J. Veget. Sci. 19: 475-484 Go to original source...
    2. ACHTZIGER R., FRIESS T. & RABITSCH W. 2007: Die Eignung von Wanzen (Insecta, Heteroptera) als Indikatoren im Naturschutz. Insecta 10: 5-39
    3. ANDOW D.A. 1991: Vegetational diversity and arthropods population response. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 561-586 Go to original source...
    4. BARNTHOL R. 2003: Nieder- und Mittelwald in Franken - Waldwirtschaftsformen aus dem Mittelalter. Fraenkisches Freilandmuseum, Bad Windsheim, 152 pp
    5. BASSET Y. 1996: Local communities of arboreal herbivores in Papua New Guinea: Predictors of insect variables. Ecology 77: 1906-1919 Go to original source...
    6. BASSET Y. 2001: Communities of insect herbivores foraging on saplings versus mature trees of Pourouma bicolor (Cecropiaceae) in Panama. Oecologia 129: 253-260 Go to original source...
    7. BASSET Y., SPRINGATE N.D., ABERLENC H.-P. & DELVARE G. 1997: A review of methods for sampling arthropods in tree canopies. In Stork J., Adis A. & Didham R.K. (eds): Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 27-52
    8. BASSET Y., HAMMOND P.M., BARRIOS H., HOLLOWAY J.D. & MILLER S.E. 2003: Vertical stratification of arthropod assemblages. In Basset Y., Novotny V., Miller S.R. & Kitching R.L. (eds): Arthropods of Tropical Forests: Spatio Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 17-27
    9. BEGON M.E., HARPER J.L. & TOWNSEND C.R. 1998: Okologie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, 750 pp
    10. BOUGET C. & DUELLI P. 2004: The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 118: 281-299 Go to original source...
    11. BRANDLE M., AMARELL U., AUGE H., KLOTZ S. & BRANDL R. 2001: Plant and insect diversity along a pollution gradient: understanding species richness across trophic levels. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 1497-1511 Go to original source...
    12. BUCKLEY G.P. 1992: Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands. Chapman & Hall, London, 352 pp Go to original source...
    13. CAUWER B.D., REHEUL D., D'HOOGHE K., NIJS I. & MILBAU A. 2006: Disturbance effects on early succession of field margins along the shaded and unshaded side of a tree lane. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 112: 78-86 Go to original source...
    14. CLARKE K.R. & WARWICK R.M. 1994: Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Natural Environment Research Council, Plymouth Marine Biological Laboratory Plymouth, UK, 144 pp
    15. COLWELL R.K. 1997: EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 8. User's guide and application published at: http://www.viceroy.eb. uconn.edu/estimates
    16. CRIST T.O., PRADHAN-DEVARE S.V. & SUMMERVILLE K.S. 2006: Spatial variation in insect community and species responses to habitat loss and plant community composition. Oecologia 147: 510-521 Go to original source...
    17. DE CAUWER B., REHEUL D., DE LAETHAUWER S., NIJS I. & MILBAU A. 2006: Effect of light and botanical species richness on insect diversity. Agron. Sustain. Devel. 26: 35-43 Go to original source...
    18. DOLEK M., FREESE-HAGER A., BUSSLER H., FLOREN A., LIEGL A. & SCHMIDL J. 2009: Ants on oaks: effects of forest structure on species composition. J. Insect Conserv.: in press Go to original source...
    19. DUDT J.F. & SHURE D.J. 1994: The influence of light and nutrients on foliar phenolics and insect herbivory. Ecology 75: 86-98 Go to original source...
    20. DUELLI P. & OBRIST M.K. 2003: Regional biodiversity in an agricultural landscape: The contribution of seminatural habitat islands. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4: 129-138 Go to original source...
    21. DUELLI P., OBRIST M.K. & FLUCKIGER P.F. 2002a: Forest edges are biodiversity hotspots: Also for Neuroptera. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. (Suppl. 2) 48: 75-87
    22. DUELLI P., OBRIST M.K. & WERMELINGER B. 2002b: Windthrowinduced changes in faunistic biodiversity in alpine spruce forest. For. Snow Landsc. Res. 77: 117-131
    23. DUFRENE M. & LEGENDRE P. 1997: Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345-366 Go to original source...
    24. ELLSWORTH D.S. & REICH P.B. 1993: Canopy structure and vertical patterns of photosynthesis and related leaf traits in a deciduous forest. Oecologia 96: 169-178 Go to original source...
    25. ERLBECK R., HASEDER I. & STINGLWAGNER G. 1998: Das Kosmos Wald- und Forstlexikon. Franckh-Kosmos, Stuttgart, 880 pp
    26. FAITH D.P., MINCHIN P.R. & BELBIN L. 1987: Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of eeological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57-68 Go to original source...
    27. FEENY P. 1970: Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51: 565-581 Go to original source...
    28. FISHER R.A., CORBET A.S. & WILLIAMS C.B. 1943: The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12: 42-58 Go to original source...
    29. FRANKLIN J.F., SPIES T.A., VAN PELT R., CAREY A.B., THORNBURGH D.A., BERG D.R., LINDENMAYER D.B., HARMON M.E., KEETON W.S., SHAW D.C., BIBLE K. & CHEN J.Q. 2002: Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For. Ecol. Manag. 155: 399-423 Go to original source...
    30. FREESE A., BENES J., BOLZ R., CIZEK O., DOLEK M., GEYER A., GROS P., KONVICKA M., LIEGL A. & STETTMER. C. 2006: Habitat use of the endangeredbutterfly Euphydryas maturna and forestry in Central Europe. Anim. Conserv. 9: 388-397 Go to original source...
    31. GERING J.C., CRIST T.O. & VEECH J.A. 2003: Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: Implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 17: 488-499 Go to original source...
    32. GOSSNER M. 2006: Phenological activity patterns of imaginal Heteroptera in the canopy of different tree species in Bavaria, Germany. Denisia 19: 1055-1094
    33. GOSSNER M. 2008: Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) communities in tree crowns of beech, oak and spruce in managed forests: Diversity, seasonality, guild structure, and tree specificity. In Floren A. & Schmidl J. (eds): Canopy Arthropod Research in Central Europe - Basic and Applied Studies from the High Frontier. Bioform Entomology, Nuernberg, pp. 119-143
    34. GOSSNER M., ENGEL K. & AMMER U. 2006: Effects of selection felling and gap felling on forest arthropod communities: a case study in a spruce-beech stand of southern Bavaria. Eur. J. Forest Res. 125: 345-360 Go to original source...
    35. GOSSNER M., ENGEL K. & JESSEL B. 2008: Plant and arthropod communities in young oak stands: are they determined by site history? Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 3165-3180 Go to original source...
    36. GRUPPE A. & SCHUBERT H. 2001: The spatial distribution and plant specificity of Neuropterida in different forest sites in Southern Germany (Raphidoptera and Neuroptera). Beitr. Entomol. 51: 517-527 Go to original source...
    37. GRUPPE A., GOSSNER M., ENGEL K. & SIMON U. 2008: Vertical and horizontal distribution of arthropods in temperate forests. In Floren A. & Schmidl J. (eds): Canopy Arthropod Research in Central Europe - Basic and Applied Studies from the High Frontier. Bioform, Nuernberg, pp. 383-405
    38. HABERLE K.-H., REITER I., NUNN A., GRUPPE A., SIMON U., GOSSNER M., WERNER H., FABIAN P. & MATYSSEK R. 2003: Cranes in temperate forests: KROCO, Freising, Germany. In Basset I., Horlyck V. & Wright J. (eds): Studying Forest Canopies from Above: The International Canopy Crane Network. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, pp. 71-78
    39. HIRAO T., MURAKAMI M., KASHIZAKI A. & TANABE S.I. 2007: Additive apportioning of lepidopteran and coleopteran species diversity across spatial and temporal scales in a cooltemperate deciduous forest in Japan. Ecol. Entomol. 32: 627-636 Go to original source...
    40. HUBER C. & BAUMGARTEN M. 2005: Early effects of forest regeneration with selective and small-scale clear-cutting on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a Norway spruce stand in Southern Bavaria (HGglwald). Biodivers. Conserv. 14: 1989-2007 Go to original source...
    41. HUTH F. & WAGNER S. 2006: Gap structure and establishment of Silver birch regeneration (Betula pendula Roth.) in Norway spruce stands (Picea abies L. Karst.). For. Ecol. Manag. 229: 314-324 Go to original source...
    42. IRMLER U. 1998: Die Vertikale Verteilung flugaktiver Kaefer (Coleoptera) in drei Waeldern Norddeutschlands. Faun. Okol. Mitt. 7: 387-404
    43. JONSELL M., WESLIEN J. & EHNSTROHM B. 1998: Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 749-764 Go to original source...
    44. KARIMZADEH J., BONSALL M.B. & WRIGHT D.J. 2004: Bottom-up and top-down effects in a tritrophic system: the population dynamics of Plutella xylostella (L.) - Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) on different host plants. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 285-293 Go to original source...
    45. KNEESHAW D. & BERGERON Y. 1996: Ecological factors affecting the abundance of advance regeneration in Quebec's southwestern boreal forest. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 888-898 Go to original source...
    46. KOIVULA M. 2002: Alternativ harvesting methods and boreal carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). For. Ecol. Manag. 167: 103-121 Go to original source...
    47. KUCHARIK C.J., NORMAN J.M. & GOWER S.T. 1999: Characterization of radiation regimes in nonrandom forest canopies: theory, measurements, and a simplified modeling approach. Tree Physiol. 19: 695-706 Go to original source...
    48. LASKA G. 2001: The disturbance and vegetation dynamics: a review and an alternative framework. Plant Ecol. 157: 77-99 Go to original source...
    49. LE CORFF J. & MARQUIS R.J. 1999: Differences between understorey and canopy in herbivore community composition and leaf quality for two oak species in Missouri. Ecol. Entomol. 24: 46-58 Go to original source...
    50. LIU S.S., ZHANG G.M. & ZHU J. 1995: Influence of temperaturevariations on rate of development in insects - analysis of case studies from entomological literature. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 107-119 Go to original source...
    51. MAGURRAN A.E. 2004: Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Science, Princeton, New Jersey, 256 pp
    52. MAY R.M. 1975: Patterns of species abundance and distribution. In Cody M. & Diamond J. (eds): Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 81-120
    53. MULLER J. 2005: Waldstrukturen als SteuergrGsse fuer Artengemeinschaften in kollinen bis submontanen Buchenwaeldern. Dissertation, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan fuer Ernaehrung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Technische Universitaet, Muenchen, 227 pp
    54. MULLER J. & GOSSNER M. 2007: Single host trees in a closed forest canopy matrix: a highly fragmented landscape? J. Appl. Entomol. 131: 613-620 Go to original source...
    55. MULLER J., SIMON U., BUSSLER H., JOKIC Z., STRATZ C., MARKL G., MULLER-KROEHLING S., HACKER H. & SCHLUMPRECHT H. 2004: WaldGkologischer Vergleich von Mittelwaeldern und Eichenmischwaeldern, Forschungsbericht der LWF, Bay. STMLF, Freising, 520 pp
    56. MULLER J., BUSSLER H., GOSSNER M., RETTELBACH T. & DUELLI P. 2008: The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: from pest to keystone species. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 2979-3001 Go to original source...
    57. MURAKAMI M. & WADA N. 1997: Difference in leaf quality between canopy trees and seedlings affects migration and survival of spring-feeding moth larvae. Can. J. For. Res./Rev. Can. Rech. For. 27: 1351-1356 Go to original source...
    58. MURAKAMI M., YOSHIDA K., HARA H. & TODA M.J. 2005: Spatiotemporal variation in Lepidopteran larval assemblages associated with oak, Quercus crispula: the importance of leaf quality. Ecol. Entomol. 30: 521-531 Go to original source...
    59. NORMAN J.M. & CAMPBELL G.S. 1989: Canopy structure. In Pearcy R.W., Mooney H.A., Ehleringer J.R. & Rundel P.W. (eds): Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 310-325
    60. PARKER G.G. 1997: Canopy structure and light environment of an old-growth Douglas-fir western Hemlock forest. Northwest Science 71: 261-270
    61. PAVLOVIC N.B., GRUNDEL R. & SLUIS W. 2006: Groundlayer vegetation gradients across oak woodland canopy gaps. J. Torrey Botan. Soc. 133: 225-239 Go to original source...
    62. PERICART J. 1972: Hemipteres Anthocoridae, Cimicidae et Microphysidae de l'Quest Palearctique. Masson et Cie, Paris, 402 pp
    63. PERICART J. 1983: Hemipteres Tingidae Euro-Mediterraneens. Federation Francaise des Societes de Sciences Naturelles, Paris, 618 pp
    64. PERICART J. 1987: Hemipteres Nabidae d'Europe occidentale et du Maghreb. Federation Francaise des Societes de Sciences Naturelles, Paris, 185 pp
    65. PETERKEN G.F. 1996: Natural Woodland; Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 536 pp
    66. RADEMACHER C., NEUERT C., GRUNDMANN V., WISSEL C. & GRIMM V. 2004: Reconstructing spatiotemporal dynamics of Central European natural beech forests: the rule-based forest model BEFORE. For. Ecol. Manag. 194: 349-368 Go to original source...
    67. REYNOLDS H.L. 1999: Plant interactions: competition. In Pugnaire F.I. & Valladares F. (eds): Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 649-676
    68. RICHARDS L.A. & WINDSOR D.M. 2007: Seasonal variation of arthropod abundance in gaps and the understorey of a lowland moist forest in Panama. J. Trop. Ecol. 23: 169-176 Go to original source...
    69. RODGERS D.J. & KITCHING R.L. 1998: Vertical stratification of rainforest collembolan (Collembola: Insecta) assemblages: Description of ecological patterns and hypotheses concerning their generation. Ecography 21: 392-400 Go to original source...
    70. ROININEN H., PRICE P.W. & TAHVANAINEN J. 1996: Bottom-up and top-down influences in the trophic system of a willow, a galling sawfly, parasitoids and inquilines. Oikos 77: 44-50 Go to original source...
    71. ROSENZWEIG M.L. 1995: Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 436 pp Go to original source...
    72. RUNKLE J.R. 1985: Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In Pickett S.T.A. & White P.S. (eds): The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 17-33 Go to original source...
    73. SHUGART H.H. 1984: Theory of Forest Dynamics. Springer, New York, 278 pp. Go to original source...
    74. SIEMANN E., TILMAN D., HAARSTAD J. & RITCHIE M. 1998: Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. Am. Nat. 152: 738-750 Go to original source...
    75. SOUTHWOOD T.R.E. 1973: The insect/plant relationship - an evolutionary perspective. In van Emden H.F. (ed.): Insect/Plant Relationships. Royal Entomological Society, London, pp. 3-30
    76. STADLER B. 2004: Wedged between bottom-up and top-down processes: aphids on tansy. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 106-116 Go to original source...
    77. STEPANOVICOVA O. 1981: Kvantitativna analyza spolocenstva bzdoch (Heteroptera) bylinneho podrastu listnateho lesa. [Quantitative analysis of an association of Heteroptera of the herbal undergrowth of a leafy tree forest.] Biologia (Bratislava) 36: 967-972
    78. STEPANOVICOVA O. & LAPKOVA Z. 1988: Topic and trophic relationships of the bug (Heteroptera) community in beech forests in the Small Carpathinas. Acta F.R.N. Univ. Comen. (Zool.) 31: 3-20
    79. STILING P. & ROSSI A.M. 1997: Experimental manipulations of top-down and bottom-up factors in a tri-trophic system. Ecology 78: 1602-1606 Go to original source...
    80. SU J.C. & WOODS S.A. 2001: Importance of sampling along a vertical gradient to compare the insect fauna in managed forests. Environ. Entomol. 30: 400-408 Go to original source...
    81. SUMMERVILLE K.S., BOULWARE M.J., VEECH J.A. & CRIST T.O. 2003: Spatial variation in species diversity and composition of forest Lepidoptera in eastern deciduous forests of North America. Conserv. Biol. 17: 1045-1057 Go to original source...
    82. SUMMERVILLE K.S., WILSON T.D., VEECH J.A. & CRIST T.O. 2006: Do body size and diet breadth affect partitioning of species diversity? A test with forest Lepidoptera. Divers. Distrib. 12: 91-99 Go to original source...
    83. SVERDRUP-THYGESON A. & IMS R.A. 2002: The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biol. Conserv. 106: 347-357 Go to original source...
    84. SZWAGRZYK J., SZEWCZYK J. & BODZIARCZYK J. 2001: Dynamics of seedling banks in beech forest: results of a 10-year study on germination, growth and survival. For. Ecol. Manag. 141: 237-250 Go to original source...
    85. TAYLOR L.R. 1978: Bates, Williams, Hutchinson-a variety of diversities. In Mound L.A. & Waloff N. (eds): Diversity of Insect Faunas. Symp. Roy. Entomol. Soc., London, pp. 1-18
    86. TSCHARNTKE T. & BRANDL R. 2004: Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49: 405-430 Go to original source...
    87. ULYSHENA M.D., HANULAA J.L., HORNA S., KILGOB J.C. & MOORMAN C.E. 2004: Spatial and temporal patterns of beetles associated with coarse woody debris in managed bottomland hardwood forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 199: 259-272 Go to original source...
    88. URBAN O., KOSVANCOVA M., MAREK M.V. & LICHTENTHALER H.K. 2007: Induction of photosynthesis and importance of limitations during the induction phase in sun and shade leaves of five ecologically contrasting tree species from the temperate zone. Tree Physiol. 27: 1207-1215 Go to original source...
    89. VANCE C.C., SMITH S.M., MALCOLM J.R., HUBER J. & BELLOCQ M.I. 2007: Differences between forest type and vertical strata in the diversity and composition of hymenopteran families and mymarid genera in northeastern temperate forests. Environ. Entomol. 36: 1073-1083 Go to original source...
    90. WACHMANN E., MELBER A. & DECKERT J. 2004: Wanzen Band 2. Goecke & Evers, Keltern, 288 pp
    91. WAGNER E. 1952: Blindwanzen oder Miriden. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 218 pp
    92. WAGNER E. 1966: Wanzen oder Heteroptera I: Pentatomorpha. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 235 pp
    93. WAGNER E. 1967: Wanzen oder Heteroptera II: Cimicomorpha. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 179 pp
    94. WERMELINGER B., FLUCKIGER P.F., OBRIST M.K. & DUELLI P. 2007: Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges. J. Appl. Entomol. 131: 104-114 Go to original source...
    95. WOLDA H. 1983: Diversity, diversity indices and tropical cockroaches. Oecologia 58: 290-298 Go to original source...
    96. YI H. 2007: Effect of thinning on flying insect communities using window traps in young Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) forests in the Pacific northwestern America. J. Plant Biol. 50: 190-197 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content