Eur. J. Entomol. 102 (1): 65-72, 2005 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2005.009

The composition of the arthropod fauna of the canopies of some species of oak (Quercus)

T. Richard E. SOUTHWOOD, G.R. William WINT, Catherine E.J. KENNEDY*, Steve R. GREENWOOD**
Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK; e-mail: richard.southwood@zoo.ox.ac.uk

1. A study was made by knockdown sampling and branch clipping of the arthropod fauna of the canopy of two native oak species (Quercus robur and Q. petraea) and of two introduced species (Q. cerris and Q. ilex ) in woods near Oxford, UK, and of two native species (Q. pubescens and Q. ilex) in southern France. Sampling was undertaken for five years in the UK and for four years in France. All the specimens from the UK, except Acarina, Collembola and Nematocera were identified to species or, occasionally, to morphotype.
2. In terms of overall numbers, species richness and biomass, the results for Q. robur and Q. petraea in the UK were very similar. Their samples contained over three times the biomass and nearly double the number of species compared with those from the introduced oak species (Q. cerris and Q. ilex).
3. The ordinal composition was very similar on Q. robur and Q. petraea, and that on Q. cerris showed closer concordance to the composition of these trees than to that of Q. ilex in the UK. The ordinal composition of the faunas of the two native oak species in France showed closer concordance to each other than to any of the oak species in the UK. The proportion of Psocoptera was much higher in the UK, and that of Thysanoptera was higher in France.
4. The guild composition in terms of numbers, species richness and biomass were closely correlated on Q. robur and Q. petraea, and on Q. robur in two different woods, which argues for an underlying determinism in the development of community structure. The guild composition on the introduced species (Q. cerris and Q. ilex) was most closely correlated when expressed as species richness.
5. The similarity of the guild composition on the oak species in the UK in terms of the actual species found was tested by a modified Sørensen's Index. This showed that the guilds could be ranked in the following order of decreasing similarity: epiphyte fauna, tourists, scavengers, phytophages, parasitoids-predators.
6. There were distinct seasonal patterns. In terms of species richness the values showed a general trend peaking in summer and early autumn, but biomass peaked in May on the native oak species, mainly due to Lepidopterous larvae. The ratio of prey to predator and parasitoid biomass had a distinct seasonal pattern, there being an excess of prey in May, but almost an equivalence throughout the rest of the season. This may reflect the high population of spiders in the late summer and autumn, which are likely to feed on tourists. Most classical ecosystem models do not allow for this latter important source of food that is not itself dependent on the communities' habitat.
7. The epiphyte dwelling guild (principally grazing Psocoptera) was a major component of the fauna in terms of numbers on the evergreen Q. ilex in UK. This has been reported for other studies of evergreen species in temperate climates.

Keywords: Canopy fauna, guilds, Quercus, species richness, introduced species, tourist guild, prey/predator ratio, epiphyte grazers

Received: June 22, 2004; Revised: December 29, 2004; Accepted: January 6, 2005; Published: March 25, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SOUTHWOOD, T.E.R., WINT, G.R.W., KENNEDY, C.E.J., & GREENWOOD, S.R. (2005). The composition of the arthropod fauna of the canopies of some species of oak (Quercus). EJE, 102(1), 65-72. doi: 10.14411/eje.2005.009
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BASSET Y. 1991: The seasonality of arboreal arthropods foraging within an Australian rainforest tree. Ecol. Entomol. 16: 265-278 Go to original source...
    2. BASSET Y. 1992: Host-specificity of arboreal and free-living insect herbivores in rain forests. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 47: 115-133 Go to original source...
    3. BASSET Y. & NOVOTNY V. 1999: Species richness of insect herbivore communities on Ficus in Papua New Guinea. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 67: 477-499 Go to original source...
    4. BASSET Y., NOVOTNY V., MILLER S.E. & KITCHING R.L. 2003: Arthropods of Tropical Forests: A Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy. Cambridge University Press, 474 pp
    5. CHASE J.M. & LEIBOLD M.A. 2003: Ecological Niches. University of Chicago Press, 212 pp Go to original source...
    6. CHEY V.K., HOLLOWAY J.D., HAMBLER C. & SPEIGHT M.R. 1998: Canopy knockdown of arthropods in exotic plantations and natural forest in Sabah, north-east Borneo, using insecticidal mist-blowing. Bull. Entomol. Res. 88: 15-24 Go to original source...
    7. CONNOR E.F., FAETH S.H., SIMBERLOFF D. & OPLER P.A. 1980: Taxonomic isolation and the accumulation of herbivorous insects: a comparison of introduced and native trees. Ecol. Entomol. 5: 205-211 Go to original source...
    8. ERWIN T.L. 1982: Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopt. Bull. 36: 74-75
    9. ERWIN T.L. & SCOTT J.C. 1980: Seasonal and size patterns, trophic structure, and richness of Coleoptera in tropical arboreal ecosystem: the fauna of the tree Luehea seemannii Triana and Planch, in the Canal Zone of Panama. Coleopt. Bull. 34: 305-322
    10. FOWLER S.V. 1985: Differences in insect species richness and faunal composition of birch seedlings, saplings and trees: the importance of plant architecture. Ecol. Entomol. 10: 159-169 Go to original source...
    11. GREENWOOD S.R. 1988: Habitat stability and wing length in two species of arboreal Psocoptera. Oikos 52: 235-238 Go to original source...
    12. GUILBERT E. 1997: Arthropod biodiversity in the canopy of New Caledonian forests. In Stork N.E., Adis J. & Didham R.K. (eds): Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 265-277 Go to original source...
    13. HIJII N. 1986: Density, biomass and guild structure of arboreal arthropods as related to their inhabited tree size in a Cryptomeria Japonica Plantation. Ecol. Res. 1: 97-118 Go to original source...
    14. HODGE S., FRAMPTON C., MARIS J., KEESING V. & VIN K.C. 2001: The trophic structure of the arthropod assemblage on Kawakawa, a New Zealand understorey tree. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 137: 173-178
    15. JANZEN D.H. 2003: How polyphagous are Costa Rican dry forest saturniid caterpillars. In Basset Y., Novotny V., Miller S.E. & Kitching R.L.:Arthropods of Tropical Forests: A SpatioTemporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 369-379
    16. KITCHING R.L., FLOATER G. & MITCHELL H. 1994: The biodiversity of arthropods from Australian rainforest canopies: ecological questions and management challenges. In Yasuno M. & Watanabe M.M. (eds): Biodiversity: Its Complexity and Role. Global Environmental Forum, Tokyo, pp. 119-137
    17. KITCHING R.L., MITCHELL H., MORSE G. & THEBAUD C. 1997: Determinants of species richness in assemblages of canopy arthropods in rainforests. In Stork N.E., Adis J. & Didham R.K. (eds): Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 131-150
    18. LE CORFF J. & MARQUIS R.J. 1999: Differences between understorey and canopy in herbivore community composition and leaf quality for two oak species in Missouri. Ecol. Entomol. 24: 46-58 Go to original source...
    19. LINSENMAIR K.E., DAVIS A.J., FIALA B. & SPEIGHT M.R. (eds) 2001: Tropical Forest Canopies: Ecology and Management (Proceedings of European Science Foundation Conference, Oxford University, 12-16 December 1998). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 370 pp Go to original source...
    20. MAJER J.D., RECHER H.F., GRAHAM R. & WATSON A. 2001: The potential of revegetation Programs to encourage invertebrates and insectivorous birds. School of Environmental Biology Bulletin No 20. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, 32 pp
    21. MITCHELL A.W., SECOY K. & JACKSON T. (eds) 2002: The Global Canopy Handbook. Global Canopy Programme, Oxford, 248 pp
    22. MODY K., BARDORZ H.A. & LINSENMAIR K.E. 2003: Organisation of arthropod assemblages in individual African savanna trees. In Basset Y., Novotny V., Miller S.E. & Kitching R.L.: Arthropods of Tropical Forests: A Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 198-212.
    23. MORAN V.C. & SOUTHWOOD T.R.E. 1982: The Guild composition of arthropod communities on trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 51: 289-306 Go to original source...
    24. NOVOTNY V., BASSET Y. & KITCHING R.L. 2003: Herbivore assemblages and their food resources. In Basset Y., Novotny V., Miller S.E. & Kitching R.L.: Arthropods of Tropical Forests: A Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Resource Use in the Canopy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 40-53
    25. PALACIO-VARGES J.G., CASTANO-MENESES G. & GOMEZ-ANAYA J.A. 1998: Collembola from the canopy of a Mexican tropical deciduous forest. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 74: 47-54
    26. PERRINS C.M. 1991: Tits and their caterpillar food supply. Ibis 138: 49-54 Go to original source...
    27. SOUTHWOOD T.R.E. 1961: The number of species of insect associated with various trees . J. Anim. Ecol. 30: 1-8 Go to original source...
    28. SOUTHWOOD T.R.E. & HENDERSON P.A. 2000: Ecological Methods. 3rd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 575 pp
    29. SOUTHWOOD T.R.E., WINT G.R.W., KENNEDY E.J. & GREENWOOD S.R. 2004: Seasonality, abundance, species richness and specificity of the phytophagous guild of insects on oak (Quercus) canopies. Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 43-50 Go to original source...
    30. STORK N.E. 1987a: Guild structure of arthropods from Bornean rain forest trees. Ecol. Entomol. 12: 69-80 Go to original source...
    31. STORK N.E. 1987b: Arthropod faunal similarity of Bornean rain forest trees. Ecol. Entomol. 12: 219-226 Go to original source...
    32. STORK N.E. 1991: The composition of the arthropod fauna of Bornean lowland rain forest trees. J. Trop. Ecol. 7: 161-180 Go to original source...
    33. STORK N.E. & BRENDELL M.J.D. 1993: Arthropod abundance in lowland rainforest of Seram. In Edwards I. & Proctor J. (eds): Natural History of Seram. Intercept Ltd, Andover, pp. 115-130
    34. STORK N.E., ADIS J. & DIDHAM R.K. (eds) 1997: Canopy Arthropods. Chapman & Hall, London, 567 pp
    35. WEST C. 1986: Insect communities in tree canopies. In Coe M. & Collins N.M.: Kora. Royal Geographical Society, London, pp. 209-222

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content