Eur. J. Entomol. 102 (1): 33-37, 2005 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2005.005

Effects of different wavelengths of light on the life attributes of two aphidophagous ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

OMKAR, Geetanjali MISHRA, Kalpana SINGH
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, 226 007 Lucknow, India;

The effect of different wavelengths of light, white (control; broad spectrum), blue (ca. 475 nm), yellow (ca. 570 nm) and red (ca. 650 nm), at constant intensity (195 ± 5 lux) on developmental time, reproductive and non-reproductive periods, fecundity, egg viability, prey consumption and fitness of two aphidophagous ladybirds, Cheilomenes sexmaculata and Propylea dissecta were studied. Both ladybird species consumed most aphids, developed fastest and reproduced best when kept under white light, followed by yellow, blue and red light. Fitness of both the ladybirds was highest under white and lowest under red light. There were positive correlations between prey consumption and developmental rate, and prey consumption and fecundity.

Keywords: Wavelength, ladybird, life attributes, Cheilomenes sexmaculata, Propylea dissecta, fitness

Received: April 6, 2004; Revised: May 31, 2004; Accepted: July 7, 2004; Published: March 25, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
OMKAR,, MISHRA, G., & SINGH, K. (2005). Effects of different wavelengths of light on the life attributes of two aphidophagous ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). EJE102(1), 33-37. doi: 10.14411/eje.2005.005
Download citation

References

  1. AARSETH K.A. & SCHRAM T.A. 1999: Wavelength-specific behaviour in Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Calanus finmarchicus to ultraviolet and visible light in laboratory experiments (Crustacea: Copepoda). Mar. Ecol. 186: 211-217 Go to original source...
  2. AGARWALA B.K. & YASUDA H. 2000: Competitive ability of ladybird predators of aphids: A review of Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Fabr.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) with a worldwide checklist of preys. J. Aphidol. 14: 1-20
  3. BLACKMER J.L., LEE L.L. & HENNEBERRY T.J. 2002: Factors affecting egg hatch, development, and survival of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) reared on an artificial feeding system. Envir. Entomol. 31: 306-312 Go to original source...
  4. DANKS H.V. 1987: Insect Dormancy: An Ecological Perspective. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, 439 pp
  5. DIMETRY N.Z. 1988: Orientation to light by the ladybird beetle. In Niemcyzk E. & Dixon A.F.G. (eds): Ecology and Effectiveness of Aphidophaga. SPB Acad. Publ., The Hague, pp. 135-140
  6. DIXON A.F.G. 2000: Insect Predator - Prey Dynamics, Ladybird Beetles and Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, New York, 257 pp
  7. FERRAN A. & LARROQUE M.M. 1977: Etude des relations hotepredateur la consommation et l'utilisation d'un puceron, Myzus persicae Sulz. par les differents stades larvaires de la Coccinelle Semiadalia undecimnotata Schn. (Col. Coccinellidae). Ann. Zool. Ecol. Anim . 9: 665-691
  8. HARMON J., LOSEY J.E. & IVES A.R. 1998: The role of vision and colour in the close proximity foraging behaviour of four coccinellid species. Oecologia 115: 287-292 Go to original source...
  9. HODEK I. 1958: Influence of temperature, relative humidity and photoperiodicity on the speed of development of Coccinella 7-punctata L. Cas. Cs. Spol. Entomol. 55: 121-141
  10. HODEK I. & HONEK A. 1996: Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 464 pp Go to original source...
  11. HODEK I. & IPERTI G. 1983: Sensitivity to photoperiod in relation to diapause in Semiadalia undecimnotata females. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 34: 9-12 Go to original source...
  12. HODEK I. & RUzICKA Z. 1979: Photoperiodic response in relation to diapause in Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera). Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov. 76: 209-218
  13. HONEK A. 1977: Annual variation in the complex of aphid predators: investigation by light trap. Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov. 74: 345-348
  14. HONEK A. & KOCOUREK F. 1986: The flight of aphid predators to a light trap: possible interpretations. In Hodek I. (ed.): Ecology of Aphidophaga. Academia, Praha & Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht, pp. 333-338
  15. IPERTI G. & PRUDENT P. 1986: Effect of the substrate properties on the choice of oviposition sites by Adalia bipunctata. In Hodek I. (ed.): Ecology of Aphidophaga. Academia, Prague & Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht, pp. 143-149
  16. LUNAU K. & WACHT S. 1997: Innate flower recognition in the hoverfly Eristalis tenax L. Mitt. Dt. Ges. Allg. Angew. Entomol. 11: 481-484
  17. MACK T.P. & SMILOWITZ Z. 1978: Diurnal, seasonal, and relative abundance of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) predators. J. N. Y. Entomol. Soc. 86: 305
  18. MCGRAW J.B. & CASWELL H. 1996: Estimation of individual fitness level from life-history data. Am. Nat. 147: 47-64 Go to original source...
  19. MIKLOSI A., GONDA Z., OSORIO D. & FARZIN A. 2002: The effects of the visual environment on responses to colour by domestic chicks. J. Comp. Physiol. (A) 188: 135-140 Go to original source...
  20. MILLS N.J. 1982: Voracity, cannibalism and coccinellid predation. Ann. Appl. Biol. 101: 144-148
  21. MIURA T. & NISHIMURA S. 1980: The larval period and predaceous activity of an aphidophagous coccinellid, Harmonia axyridis Pallas. Bull. Fac. Agric. Shimane Univ . 14: 144-148
  22. MONDOR E.B. & WARREN J.L. 2000: Unconditioned and conditioned responses to colour in the predatory coccinellid, Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 97: 463-467 Go to original source...
  23. MULLER H.J. 1992: Dormanz bei Arthropoden. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, New York, 289 pp
  24. NAKAMUTA K. 1984: Visual orientation of a ladybeetle, Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), towards its prey. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 19: 82-86 Go to original source...
  25. NAKAMUTA K. 1987: Diel rhythmicity of prey-search activity and its predominance over starvation in the ladybeetle, Coccinella septempunctata brucki Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): releasing stimuli and decision of giving-up time. Jap. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 29: 55-60 Go to original source...
  26. OMKAR & MISHRA G. 2003: Ovipositional orientation of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta (Mulsant). Insect Sci. Applic. 23: 211-219 Go to original source...
  27. OMKAR & PERVEZ A. 2000: Sexual dimorphism in Propylea dissecta (Mulsant), (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera). J. Aphidol. 14: 139-140
  28. OMKAR & PERVEZ A. 2003: Influence of prey deprivation on the biological attributes of pale morph of Propylea dissecta (Mulsant). Insect Sci Applic. 23: 143-148 Go to original source...
  29. OMKAR, MISHRA G., SRIVASTAVA S. & GUPTA A.K. 2004: Ovipositional rhythmicity in ladybird beetles: a laboratory study. Biol. Rhy. Res. 35 (in press) Go to original source...
  30. PERVEZ A. 2002: Contribution on Prey-Predator Relationship and Reproductive Biology of a Colour Morph of Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lucknow, India, 197 pp
  31. PERVEZ A. & OMKAR 2003: Predation potential and handling time estimates of a generalist aphidophagous ladybird, Propylea dissecta . Biol. Mem. 29: 91-97
  32. PERVEZ A. & OMKAR 2004a: Prey dependent life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta (Mulsant). Biocont. Sci. Tech. 14: 385-396 Go to original source...
  33. PERVEZ A. & OMKAR 2004b: Temperature dependent life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta (Mulsant). Biocont. Sci. Tech. 14: 587-594 Go to original source...
  34. PERVEZ A., OMKAR & RICHMOND A.S. 2004: The influence of age on reproductive performance of a predatory ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta. J. Insect Sci. 4(22): 1-8 Go to original source...
  35. PRAYITNO D.S., PHILLIPS C.J.C. & STOKES D.K. 1997: The effects of color and intensity of light on behavior and leg disorders in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 76: 1674-1681 Go to original source...
  36. PHILLIPS C.J.C. & LOMAS C.A. 2001: The perception of color by cattle and its influence on behavior. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 807-813. Go to original source...
  37. PULLIAINEN E. 1963: Preliminary notes on the humidity reactions of Myrrha 18-guttata L. (Col., Coccinellidae). Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 29: 240-246
  38. PULLIAINEN E. 1964: Studies on the humidity and light orientation and the flying activity of Myrrha 18-guttata L. (Col., Coccinellidae). Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 30: 117-141
  39. QUILICI S. & IPERTI G. 1986: The influence of host plant on the searching ability of first instar larvae of Propylea quatuordecimpunctata. In Hodek I. (ed.): Ecology of Aphidophaga. Academia, Prague & Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht, pp. 99-106
  40. SADEGHI H. & GILBERT F. 1999: Individual variation in oviposition preference, and its interaction with larval performance in an insect predator. Oecologia 118: 405-411 Go to original source...
  41. SADEGHI H. & GILBERT F. 2000: Aphid suitability and its relationship to oviposition preference in predatory hoverflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 771-784 Go to original source...
  42. SAKAI T., ISONO K., TOMARU M., FUKATAMI A. & OGUMA Y. 2002: Light wavelength dependency of mating activity in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Genes Genetic Sys. 77: 187-195 Go to original source...
  43. SAKAMOTO K., ASAI R., OKADA A. & SHIMIZU I. 2003: Effect of carotenoid depletion on the hatching rhythm of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Biol. Rhy. Res. 34: 61-71 Go to original source...
  44. TAUBER M.J., TAUBER C.A. & MASAKI S. 1986: Seasonal Adaptation of Insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 411 pp
  45. WHITE R.H., STEVENSON R.D., BENNETT R.R., CUTLER D.E. & HABER W.A. 1994: Wavelength discrimination and the role of ultraviolet vision in the feeding behavior of hawkmoths. Biotropica 26: 427-435 Go to original source...
  46. ZOTOV V.A. 1983: Exogenous and endogenous components of the diel rhythm of activity in Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Zool. Zh. 62: 1654-1661

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.