Eur. J. Entomol. 101 (4): 689-692, 2004 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2004.090

A novel relationship between ants and a leafhopper (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)

Florian M. STEINER1, Birgit C. SCHLICK-STEINER1, Werner HOLZINGER2, Christian KOMPOSCH2, Sylvie PAZOUTOVA3, Matthias SANETRA4, Erhard CHRISTIAN1
1 Institute of Zoology, Department of Integrative Biology, and Institute of Forest Entomology, Forest Pathology and Forest Protection, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, A-1180 Wien, Austria; e-mail: h9304696@edv1.boku.ac.at
2 Ökoteam - Institute of Faunistics and Animal Ecology, Bergmanngasse 22, A-8010 Graz, Austria; e-mail: oekoteam@sime.com
3 Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, VídeĖská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic; e-mail: pazouto@biomed.cas.cz
4 Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany

Ten ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from three subfamilies feed on honeydew excreted by nymphs of the leafhopper Balclutha punctata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). This relationship is facultative for the partners. Preliminary field observations suggest a mutualistic interaction that represents an intermediate stage in the spectrum of formicid-hemipteran mutualisms. Behavioural adaptations of the leafhopper (no escape reaction) and the ants (no predation of leafhoppers, protection from spiders) are evident, but characters of advanced facultative mutualism such as physical contact between the partners or ant-triggered excretion of honeydew were not observed.

Keywords: Araneae, Auchenorrhyncha, ant-leafhopper relationship, honeydew, insect-insect interactions, mutualism, Cicadellidae, Formicidae, Balclutha punctata, Calamagrostis epigejos

Received: January 26, 2004; Revised: June 21, 2004; Accepted: July 30, 2004; Published: December 20, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
STEINER, F.M., SCHLICK-STEINER, B.C., HOLZINGER, W., KOMPOSCH, C., PAZOUTOVA, S., SANETRA, M., & CHRISTIAN, E. (2004). A novel relationship between ants and a leafhopper (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). EJE101(4), 689-692. doi: 10.14411/eje.2004.090
Download citation

References

  1. BARNETT H.L. & HUNTER B.B. 1998: Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi, 4th ed. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota, 218 pp
  2. CARVER M., GROSS G.F. & WOODWARD T.E. 1991: Hemiptera (bugs, leafhoppers, cicadas, aphids, scale insects etc.). In Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (ed.): The Insects of Australia. A Textbook for Students and Research Workers. Melbourne University Press, Carlton, pp. 429-515
  3. CUSHMAN J.H. & WHITHAM T.G. 1989: Conditional mutualism in a membracid-ant association: temporal, age-specific, and density-dependent effects. Ecology 70: 1040-1047 Go to original source...
  4. DEJEAN A., NGNEGUEU P.R. & BOURGOIN T. 1996: Trophobiosis between ants and Peregrinus maidis (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Delphacidae). Sociobiology 28: 111-120
  5. DEL-CLARO K. & OLIVEIRA P.S. 1999: Ant-Homoptera interactions in a neotropical savanna: the honeydew-producing treehopper, Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae), and its associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliacea). Biotropica 31: 135-144 Go to original source...
  6. DELABIE J.H.C. 2001: Trophobiosis between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an overview. Neotrop. Entomol. 30: 501-516 Go to original source...
  7. DIETRICH C.H. & MCKAMEY S.H. 1990: Three new idiocerine leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) from Guayana with notes on ant-mutualism and subsociality. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 92: 214-223
  8. FRITZ R.S. 1982: An ant-treehopper mutualism: effects of Formica subsericea on the survival of Vanduzea arquata. Ecol. Entomol. 7: 267-276 Go to original source...
  9. GULLAN P.J. 1997: Relationships with ants. In Ben-Dov Y. & HODGSON C.J. (eds): Soft Scale Insects - Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Dordrecht, pp. 351-373 Go to original source...
  10. HERRE E.A., KNOWLTON N., MUELLER U.G. & REHNER S.A. 1999: The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 49-53 Go to original source...
  11. HOLLDOBLER B. & WILSON E.O. 1990: The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 732 pp
  12. LARSEN K.J., HEADY S.E. & NAULT L.R. 1992: Influence of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on honeydew excretion and escape behaviors in a myrmecophile, Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), and its congeners. J. Insect Behav. 5: 109-122 Go to original source...
  13. MOYA-RAYGOZA G. & NAULT L.R. 2000: Obligatory mutualism between Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and attendant ants. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 929-940 Go to original source...
  14. NYFFELER M. 1999: Prey selection of spiders in the field. J. Arachnol. 27: 217-324
  15. NYFFELER M. & BENZ G. 1989: Foraging ecology and predatory importance of a guild of orb-weaving spiders in a grassland habitat. J. Appl. Entomol. 107: 166-184 Go to original source...
  16. NYFFELER M., DEAN D.A. & STERLING W.L. 1992: Diets, feeding specialization, and predatory role of two lynx spiders, Oxyopes salticus and Peucetia viridans (Araneae: Oxyopidae), in a Texas cotton agroecosystem. Envir. Entomol. 21: 1457-1465 Go to original source...
  17. OSSIANNILSSON F. 1983: The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Part 3: The family Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae, catalogue, literature and index. Fauna Entomol. Scand. 7: 594-979 Go to original source...
  18. ROBERTS M.J. 1995: Collins Field Guide. Spiders of Britain & Northern Europe. Harper Collins Publisher, London, 383 pp
  19. SCHONROGGE K., WARDLAW J.C., THOMAS J.A. & ELMES G.W. 2000: Polymorphic growth rates in myrmecophilous insects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 267: 771-777 Go to original source...
  20. SEIFERT B. 1996: Ameisen: beobachten, bestimmen. Naturbuch Verlag, Augsburg, 351 pp
  21. SHCHERBAKOV D.E., FLETCHER M.J. & DAY M.F. 2000: Ant attendance and nocturnal feeding of the leafhopper Smicrocotis obscura Kirkaldy (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Ledrinae). Austral. Entomol. 27: 39-43
  22. STADLER B. & DIXON A.F.G. 1999: Ant attendance in aphids: why different degrees of myrmecophily? Ecol. Entomol. 24: 363-369 Go to original source...
  23. STADLER B., FIEDLER K., KAWECKI T.J. & WEISSER W.W. 2001: Costs and benefits for phytophagous myrmecophiles: when ants are not always available. Oikos 92: 467-478 Go to original source...
  24. STAEGER R. 1908: Zur Biologie des Mutterkorns. Zentbl. Bakt. Parasitkde Infektionskrankh. (II) 20: 272-279
  25. VILBASTE J. 1982: Preliminary key for the identification of the nymphs of North European Homoptera Cicadinea. II. Cicadelloidea. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 19: 1-20
  26. WAY M.J. 1963: Mutualism between ants and honeydewproducing homoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8: 307-344 Go to original source...
  27. WOLF A. 1991: Cheiracanthium. In Heimer S. & Nentwig W. (eds.): Spinnen Mitteleuropas. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin & Hamburg, pp. 396-398, plates 181-182
  28. ZABKA M. 1997: Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae). Fauna Polon. 19: 1-188

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.