Eur. J. Entomol. 105 (2): 219-226, 2008 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2008.031

Differences in mating strategies in two closely related small ermine moth species (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae)

Aletta C. BAKKER*, Wil E. VAN GINKEL, Peter ROESSINGH**, Steph B.J. MENKEN
University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, P.O. Box 94062, 1090 GB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

The degree of polyandry in a species is linked to other life history traits such as egg maturation, life span, and male ejaculate size and quality. The study of differences in mating strategies between closely related species can provide a better understanding of the evolution of these strategies and of sperm competition. Mating patterns of two closely related species of small ermine moths (Yponomeuta) were investigated in the laboratory. The average female age at first mating was higher in Y. cagnagellus than in Y. padellus. Both species mated more than once; however, Y. cagnagellus females were more likely to remate in a short time frame. Moreover, Y. cagnagellus had higher life time female mating frequencies than Y. padellus (viz., 3.0 versus 2.0). These differences in mating frequency were confirmed in the field by examining the presence of spermatophores (or their remains) in the bursa as well as sperm in the spermatheca of field-caught females.

Keywords: Lepidoptera, mating frequencies, Yponomeuta padellus, Y. cagnagellus, polyandry

Received: December 22, 2007; Revised: March 5, 2008; Accepted: March 5, 2008; Published: May 15, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BAKKER, A.C., VAN GINKEL, W.E., ROESSINGH, P., & MENKEN, S.B.J. (2008). Differences in mating strategies in two closely related small ermine moth species (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). EJE, 105(2), 219-226. doi: 10.14411/eje.2008.031
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ARNQVIST G. & NILSSON T. 2000: The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60: 145-164 Go to original source...
    2. BAKKER A.C., ROESSINGH P. & MENKEN S.B.J. 2008: Sympatric speciation in Yponomeuta: no evidence for host plant fidelity. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 128 (in press) Go to original source...
    3. BATEMAN A.J. 1948: Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349-368 Go to original source...
    4. BERGSTROM J., WIKLUND C. & KAITALA A. 2002: Natural variation in female mating frequency in a polyandrous butterfly: effects of size and age. Anim. Behav. 64: 49-54 Go to original source...
    5. BEZZERIDES A. & EISNER T. 2002: Apportionment of nuptial alkaloidal gifts by a multiply-mated female moth (Utetheisa ornatrix): eggs individually receive alkaloid from more than one male source. Chemoecology 12: 213-218 Go to original source...
    6. BISSOONDATH C.J. & WIKLUND C. 1995: Protein-content of spermatophores in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37: 365-371 Go to original source...
    7. BYERS J.R. 1978: Biosystematics of the genus Euxoa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) X. Incidence and level of multiple mating in natural and laboratory populations. Can. Entomol. 110: 193-200 Go to original source...
    8. COOK P.A. 1999: Sperm numbers and female fertility in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Huebner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Insect Behav. 12: 767-779 Go to original source...
    9. DRUMMOND B.A. II 1984: Multiple mating and sperm competition. In Smith R.L. (ed.): Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. Academic Press, New York, pp. 291-370 Go to original source...
    10. GURDON G.B. 1991: Nuclear transplantation in Xenopus. In Kray B. & Peng B. (eds): Methods in Cell Biology, Academic Press, London, pp. 299-306 Go to original source...
    11. HENDRIKSE A. 1979: Activity patterns and sex pheromone specificity as isolating mechanisms in eight species of Yponomeuta (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 25: 172-180 Go to original source...
    12. HUGHES L.B., CHANG S., WAGNER D. & PIERCE N.E. 2000: Effects of mating history on ejaculate size, fecundity, longevity, and copulation duration in the ant-tended lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47: 119-128 Go to original source...
    13. JERVIS M.A., BOGGS C.L. & FERNS P.N. 2005: Egg maturation strategy and its associated trade-offs: a synthesis focusing on Lepidoptera. Ecol. Entomol. 30: 359-375 Go to original source...
    14. KAITALA A. & WIKLUND C. 1994: Polyandrous female butterflies forage for matings. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 385-388 Go to original source...
    15. KAITALA A. & WIKLUND C. 1995: Female mate choice and mating costs in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). J. Insect Behav. 13: 355-362 Go to original source...
    16. MENKEN S.B.J., HERREBOUT W.M. & WIEBES J.T. 1992: Small ermine moths (Yponomeuta): their host relations and evolution. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37: 41-66 Go to original source...
    17. MORROW E.H. & GAGE M.J.G. 2000: The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 267: 307-313 Go to original source...
    18. MORROW E.H., ARNQVIST G. & PITNICK S. 2003: Adaptation versus pleiotropy: Why do males harm their mates? Behav. Ecol. 14: 802-806 Go to original source...
    19. PARKER G.A. 1970: Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525-567 Go to original source...
    20. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM 2005: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
    21. ROWE L. 1994: The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim. Behav. 48: 1049-1056 Go to original source...
    22. SPSS 2003: Statistical Analysis Package SPSS version 12.01. SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois
    23. SVARD L. & WIKLUND C. 1989: Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry/polyandry in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 395-402 Go to original source...
    24. TORRES-VILA L.M., STOCKEL J. & RODRIGUEZ-MOLINA M.C. 1997: Physiological factors regulating polyandry in Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Physiol. Entomol. 22: 387-393 Go to original source...
    25. TORRES-VILA L.M., RODRIGUEZ-MOLINA M.C., GRAGERA J. & BIELZA-LINO P. 2001: Polyandry in Lepidoptera: a heritable trait in Spodoptera exigua Huebner. Heredity 86: 177-183 Go to original source...
    26. TORRES-VILA L.M., GRAGERA J., RODRIGUEZ-MOLINA M.C. & STOCKEL J. 2002: Heritable variation for female remating in Lobesia botrana, a usually monandrous moth. Anim. Behav. 64: 899-907 Go to original source...
    27. VALIMAKI P. & KAITALA A. 2006: Does a lack of mating opportunities explain monandry in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi)? Oikos 115: 110-116 Go to original source...
    28. VALIMAKI P. & KAITALA A. 2007: Life history trade-offs in relation to the degree of polyandry and developmental pathway in Pieris napi (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Oikos 116: 1569-1580 Go to original source...
    29. VALIMAKI P., KAITALA A. & KOKKO H. 2006: Temporal patterns in reproduction may explain variation in mating frequencies in the green-veined white butterfly Pieris napi. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 99-107 Go to original source...
    30. VOETDIJK B., BAKKER A.C. & BREEUWER J.A.J. 2007: Microsatellite markers for testing host plant-related population differentiation in the moth genus Yponomeuta. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7: 66-68 Go to original source...
    31. WATANABE M. & HIROTA M. 1999: Effects of sucrose intake on spermatophore mass produced by male swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus L. Zool. Sci. 16: 55-61. Go to original source...
    32. WEDELL N., WIKLUND C. & COOK P.A. 2002: Monandry and polyandry as alternative lifestyles in a butterfly. Behav. Ecol. 13: 450-455 Go to original source...
    33. WIKLUND C. 1982: Behavioural shift from courtship solicitation to mate avoidance in female ringlet butterflies (Aphantopus hyperanthus) after copulation. Anim. Behav. 30: 790-793 Go to original source...
    34. WIKLUND C., GOTTHARD K. & NYLIN S. 2003: Mating system and the evolution of sex specific mortality rates in two nymphalid butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 270: 1823-1828 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content