Eur. J. Entomol. 122: 229-241, 2025 | DOI: 10.14411/eje.2025.029

Population structure and habitat connectivity of Phengaris teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in southern Slovenia: Implications for conservation and landscape managementOriginal article

Jure JUGOVIC ORCID..., Ines GORKIČ, Martina LUŽNIK ORCID...*
Department of Biodiversity, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Glagoljaška 8, 6000 Koper, Slovenia; e-mails: jure.jugovic@gmail.com, ines.gorkic@gmail.com, martina.luznik@upr.si

We studied the vulnerable Scarce Large Blue butterfly (Phengaris teleius) population in loosely connected wet grasslands in southern Slovenia. Our goal was to understand the distribution and demographic traits of this population within the Seasonal Lakes of Pivka Nature Park (KP PPJ). From 2021 to 2022, we mapped suitable habitat patches in KP PPJ with the larval host plant Sanguisorba officinalis and host ant Myrmica spp. Out of eight identified potential patches, five were inhabited for at least one year. Our dispersal model, using an inverse-power function, indicated that all but one suitable patch could be connected by migrations of at least 1% of either sex, suggesting a metapopulation structure. The clustered habitat distribution (nearest neighbour index = 0.14) highlights the role of each patch as a "stepping stone" within the system. We also assessed demographic parameters in a subset of three patches: Klenik, Kalec, and Zagorje. In 2021, mark-release-recapture estimated the populations in two inhabited patches (Klenik, Kalec) at 197 males (95% CI: 159-265) and 315 females (95% CI: 205-525), showing a female-biased sex ratio (males : females = 1 : 1.6). We recorded a relatively long average life span (4.4 and 8.4 days for males and females, respectively) and a weak protandry, however about three-quarters of the population was present simultaneously, mainly in the largest patch (Klenik: > 85%). Recorded demographic traits (female-biased sex ratio, long lifespan, simultaneous peaks of both sexes, and high dispersal) support the persistence of this metapopulation. However, conservation efforts and a denser network of suitable patches are crucial to maintain its viability at this range's southern edge.

Keywords: Butterfly, mark-release-recapture, demography, movement, metapopulation

Received: December 19, 2024; Revised: August 24, 2025; Accepted: August 24, 2025; Published online: September 19, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
JUGOVIC, J., GORKIČ, I., & LUŽNIK, M. (2025). Population structure and habitat connectivity of Phengaris teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in southern Slovenia: Implications for conservation and landscape management. EJE, 122, Article 229-241. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2025.029
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Baguette M. 2003: Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. - Ecography 26: 153-160. Go to original source...
    2. Baguette M., Petit S. & Queva F. 2000: Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: Consequences for conservation. - J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 100-108. Go to original source...
    3. Batary P., Örvössy N., Kőrösi A., Vályi-Nagy M. & Peregovits L. 2007: Microhabitat preferences of Maculinea teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in a mosaic landscape. - Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 731-736. Go to original source...
    4. Binzenhöfer B. & Settele J. 2000: Vergleichende autökologische Untersuchungen an Maculinea nausithous (Bergstr., 1779) und Maculinea teleius (Bergstr., 1779) (Lep: Lycaenidae) im nördlichen Steigerwald. In Settele J. & Kleinewietfeld S. (eds): Populationsökoligische Studien an Tagfaltern 2. UFZ- Bericht, Leipzig, pp. 1-99.
    5. Brook B.W., Bradshaw C.J., Traill L.W. & Frankham R. 2011: Minimum viable population size: not magic, but necessary. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 619-620. Go to original source...
    6. Burgman M.A. & Fox J.C. 2003: Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. - Anim. Conserv. 6: 19-28. Go to original source...
    7. Burnham K.P. & Anderson D.R. 2002: Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd ed. Springer, New York, 488 pp.
    8. Casacci L.P., Bonelli S., Balletto E. & Barbero F. 2019: Multimodal Signaling in Myrmecophilous Butterflies. - Front. Ecol. Evol. 7: 454, 15 pp. Go to original source...
    9. Caughley G. 1994: Directions in conservation biology. - J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 215-244. Go to original source...
    10. Clark P.J. & Evans F.C. 1954: Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. - Ecology 35: 445-453. Go to original source...
    11. Crandall K.A., Bininda-Emonds O.R.R., Mace G.M. & Wayne R.K. 2000: Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 290-295. Go to original source...
    12. Crawford L.A. & Keyghobadi N. 2018: Flight morphology corresponds to both surrounding landscape structure and local patch conditions in a highly specialized peatland butterfy (Lycaena epixanthe). - Ecol. Entomol. 43: 629-639. Go to original source...
    13. Čelik T. 2007: Butterflies (Lep.: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) as bioindicators for nature conservation evaluation of the Planinsko polje. - Varstvo Narave 20: 83-105 [in Slovenian].
    14. Čelik T. 2012: Adult demography, spatial distribution and movements of Zerynthia polyxena (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in a dense network of permanent habitats. - Eur. J. Entomol. 109: 217-227 Go to original source...
    15. Elmes G.W., Thomas J.A., Wardlaw J.C., Hochberg M.E., Clarke R.T. & Simcox D.J. 1998: The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea butterflies. - J. Insect Conserv. 2: 67-78. Go to original source...
    16. European Comission 1992: EU Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC. URL: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/ nature-and-biodiversity/habitats-directive_en (last accessed 5 Apr. 2024).
    17. Flather C.H., Hayward G.D., Beissinger S.R. & Stephens P.A. 2011a: Minimum viable populations: is there a 'magic number' for conservation practitioners? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 307-316. Go to original source...
    18. Flather C.H., Hayward G.D., Beissinger S.R. & Stephens P.A. 2011b: A general target for MVPs: unsupported and unnecessary. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 620-622. Go to original source...
    19. Frankham R. 2003: Genetics and conservation biology. - C. R. Biol. 326: 22-29. Go to original source...
    20. Fric Z. & Konvicka M. 2007: Dispersal kernels of butterflies: Power-law functions are invariant to marking frequency. - Basic Appl. Ecol. 8: 377-386. Go to original source...
    21. Gao K., Li X., Chen F. & Settele F. 2016: Distribution and habitats of Phengaris (Maculinea) butterflies and population ecology of Phengaris teleius in China. - J. Insect Conserv. 20: 1-10. Go to original source...
    22. Glasnović P. & Surina B. 2021: Analysis of Grassland Stands in the Landscape Park Pivška intersihajojča jezera. First Report. PIVKA.KRAS.PRESIHA. University of Primorska, Koper, 24 pp. [in Slovenian].
    23. Hanski I. 1997: Metapopulation dynamics: from concepts and observations to predictive models in metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. In Hanski I. & Gilpin M. (eds): Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 69-91. Go to original source...
    24. Hanski I. & Gaggiotti O. 2004: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations. 1st ed. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, 696 pp.
    25. Hare M.P., Nunney L., Schwartz M.K., Ruzzante D.E., Burford M., Waples R.S., Ruegg K. & Palstra F. 2011: Understanding and estimating effective population size for practical application in marine species management. - Conserv. Biol. 25: 438-449. Go to original source...
    26. Harmon L. & Braude S. 2010: Conservation of small populations: Effective population sizes, inbreeding, and the 50/500 pule. In Braude S. & Low B.S. (eds): An Introduction to Methods and Models in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology. Princeton University Press, pp. 125-138. Go to original source...
    27. Hayes M.P. 2015: The biology and ecology of the large blue butterfly Phengaris (Maculinea) arion: a review. - J. Insect Conserv. 19: 1115-1130. Go to original source...
    28. Hill J.K., Thomas C.D. & Lewis O.T. 1996: Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: Implications for metapopulation structure. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 725-735. Go to original source...
    29. IUCN 2012: IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Ver. 3.1. 2nd ed. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, URL: https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/10315
    30. Jugovic J. & Jeklar M. 2021: A seasonal dynamics and population status of the steno-endemic karst fairy shrimp Chirocephalus croaticus (Steuer, 1899) (Branchiopoda, Anostraca) from Slovenia. - Crustaceana 94: 529-549. Go to original source...
    31. Jugovic J., Črne M. & Fišer Pečnikar Ž. 2013: The impact of grazing, overgrowth and mowing on spring butterfly (Lepido­ptera: Rhopalocera) assemblages on dry karst meadows and pastures. - Nat. Croat. 22: 157-169.
    32. Jugovic J., Črne M. & Lužnik M. 2017: Movement, demography and behaviour of a highly mobile species: A case study of the black-veined white, Aporia crataegi (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). - Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 113-122. Go to original source...
    33. Jugovic J., Uboni C., Zupan S. & Lužnik M. 2018: Demography of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): A case study of populations in sub-Mediterranean dry calcareous grasslands. - Eur. J. Entomol. 115: 493-503. Go to original source...
    34. Jugovic J., Kostadinovski L. & Kopač K. 2023: Oviposition preferences of the Alcon Large Blue Phengaris alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) at a seasonal lake in southwestern Slovenia. - Pol. J. Ecol. 71: 15-25. Go to original source...
    35. Kajzer-Bonk J. & Nowicki P. 2022: Butterflies in trouble: The effectiveness of Natura 2000 network in preventing habitat loss and population declines of endangered species urban area. - Ecol. Indicat. 135: 108518, 13 pp. Go to original source...
    36. Kajzer-Bonk J., Śliwińska E.B. & Malik K. 2024: Plant invasion alters movement behaviour in endangered butterflies but not their morphology or genetic variability. - J. Insect Conserv. 28: 981-991. Go to original source...
    37. Kallioniemi E. 2014: Inter- and intra-specific differences in butterfly behaviour at boundaries. - Insect Conserv. Divers. 7: 232-240. Go to original source...
    38. Keith D., Akcakaya H.R., Butchart S., Collen B., Dulvy N., Holmes E., Hutchings J., Keinath D., Schwartz M., Shelton A. & Waples R. 2015: Temporal correlations in population trends: Conservation implications from time-series analysis of diverse animal taxa. - Biol. Conserv. 192: 247-257. Go to original source...
    39. Labandeira C.C., Johnson K.R. & Wilf P. 2002: Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant-insect associations. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 2061-2066. Go to original source...
    40. Louy D., Habel J.C., Schmitt T., Assmann T., Meyer M. & Müller P. 2007: Strongly diverging population genetic patterns of three skipper species: the role of habitat fragmentation and dispersal ability. - Conserv. Genet. 8: 671-681. Go to original source...
    41. Lundberg P., Ranta E., Ripa J. & Kaitala V.V. 2000: Population variability in space and time. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 460-464. Go to original source...
    42. Malačič K. 2005: Migratory Potential and Threats to Maculinea teleius Bergsträsser 1997 and Maculinea nausithous Bergsträsser 1779 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in East Goričko. PhD thesis, University of Ljubljana, 58 pp. [in Slovenian].
    43. Martin Y., Titeux N. & Van Dyck H. 2021: Range expansion, habitat use, and choosiness in a butterfly under climate change: Marginality and tolerance of oviposition site selection. - Ecol. Evol. 11: 2336-2345. Go to original source...
    44. Moritz C. 1994: Defining "Evolutionarily Significant Units" for conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 373-375. Go to original source...
    45. Moritz C. 2002: Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. - Syst. Biol. 51: 238-254. Go to original source...
    46. Morris W., Doak D., Groom M., Kareiva P., Fieberg J., Gerber L., Murphy P. & Thomson D. 1999: A Practical Handbook for Population Viability Analysis. The Nature Conservancy, 83 pp.
    47. Mulec J., Mihevc A. & Pipan T. 2005: Intermittent lakes in the Pivka basin. - Acta Carsologica 34/3: 543-565. Go to original source...
    48. Newland D., Still R., Swash A. & Tomlinson D. 2020: Britain's Butterflies. Princeton University Press, 256 pp. Go to original source...
    49. Nowicki P., Witek M., Skórka P., Settele J. & Woyciechowski M. 2005a: Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. - Popul. Ecol. 47: 193-202. Go to original source...
    50. Nowicki P., Bonelli S., Barbero F., Balletto E., Settele J., Kühn E. & Thomas J. 2005b: Population dynamics in the genus Maculinea revisited: comparative study of sympatric M. alcon and M. teleius. In Settele J., Kühn E. & Thomas J.A. (eds): Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea Butterflies as a Model. Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2. Pensoft, Sofia, pp. 136-139.
    51. Nowicki P., Richter A., Glinka U., Holzschuh A., Toelke U., Henle K., Woyciechowski M. & Settele J. 2005c: Less input same output: Simplified approach for population size assessment in Lepidoptera. - Popul. Ecol. 47: 203-212. Go to original source...
    52. Nowicki P., Vrabec V., Binzenhöfer B., Feil J., Zakšek B., Hovestadt T. & Settele J. 2014: Butterfly dispersal in inhospitable matrix: rare, risky, but long-distance. - Landsc. Ecol. 29: 401-412. Go to original source...
    53. Nowicki P., Deoniziak K., Dziekańska I., Kostro-Ambroziak A., Plazio E., Rutkowski R. & Sielezniew M. 2019: What keeps 'living dead' alive: demography of a small and isolated population of Maculinea (= Phengaris) alcon. - J. Insect Conserv. 23: 201-210. Go to original source...
    54. Pennekamp F., Garcia-Pereira P. & Schmitt T. 2014: Habitat requirements and dispersal ability of the Spanish Fritillary (Euphydryas desfontainii) in southern Portugal: Evidence-based conservation suggestions for an endangered taxon. - J. Insect Conserv. 18: 497-508. Go to original source...
    55. Pérez-Pereira N., Wang J., Quesada H. & Caballero A. 2022: Prediction of the minimum effective size of a population viable in the long term. - Biodivers. Conserv. 31: 2763-2780. Go to original source...
    56. Popović M. & Nowicki P. 2023: Movements of a specialist butterfly in relation to rowing management of its habitat patches. - Biology 12: 344, 14 pp. Go to original source...
    57. Popović M., Radaković M., Đurđević A., Franeta F. & Verovnik R. 2014: Distribution and threats of Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in northern Serbia. - Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 60: 173-183.
    58. Popović M., Šašić M., Medenica I., Šeat J., Đurđević A. & Crnobrnja-Isailović J. 2017: Living on the edge: Population ecology of Phengaris teleius in Serbia. - J. Insect Conserv. 21: 401-409. Go to original source...
    59. Popović M., Golubović A. & Nowicki P. 2022: Intersexual differences in behaviour and resource use of specialist Phengaris teleius butterflies. - Insects 13: 262, 9 pp. Go to original source...
    60. Rebeušek F. 2006: Phengaris Butterflies in Slovenia: Distribution, Ecology, Conservation. Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Miklavž na Dravskem polju, 16 pp. [in Slovenian].
    61. Ridley M. 2009: Evolution. 3rd ed. Wiley, Blackwell, 800 pp.
    62. Sánchez-Sastre L.F., Ramírez-del-Palacio Ó., Martín-Ramos P. & Hernández-Minguillón M.-Á. 2025: Genetic diversity and connectivity of the vulnerable species Phengaris nausithous in Palencia (Northern Spain). - Insects 16: 193, 18 pp. Go to original source...
    63. Schwarz C.J. & Arnason A.N. 1996: A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. - Biometrics 52: 860-873. Go to original source...
    64. Seifert B. 2018: The Ants of Central and North Europe. Iutra Verlags und Vertriebsgesellschaft, Taur, 408 pp.
    65. Sielezniew M. & Stankiewicz A. 2013: Behavioural evidence for putative oviposition-deterring pheromone in the butterfly, Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). - Eur. J. Entomol. 110: 71-80. Go to original source...
    66. Skórka P., Settele J. & Woyciechowski M. 2007: Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland. - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 121: 319-324. Go to original source...
    67. Stettmer C., Binzenhöfer B. & Hartmann P. 2001: Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaβnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous. Teil 1: Populationsdynamik, Ausbreitungsverhalten und Biotopverbund. - Nat. Landsch. 76: 278-287.
    68. Sunde J., Franzén M., Betzholtz P.E., Francioli Y., Pettersson L.B., Pöyry J., Ryrholm N. & Forsman A. 2023: Century-long butterfly range expansions in northern Europe depend on climate, land use and species traits. - Commun. Biol. 6: 601, 14 pp. Go to original source...
    69. Thomas J.A. 1984: The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the dusky large blue butterfly) and M. teleius (the scarce large blue) in France. - Biol. Conserv. 28: 325-347. Go to original source...
    70. Thomas J.A. 1995: The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue butterfly. In Pullin A.S. (ed.): Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 180-197. Go to original source...
    71. Thomas J. 2002: Larval niche selection and evening exposure enhance adoption of a predacious social parasite, Maculinea arion (large blue butterfly), by Myrmica ants. - Oecologia 132: 531-537. Go to original source...
    72. Thomas J.A. 2005: Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 360: 339-357. Go to original source...
    73. Thomas J.A. & Settele J. 2004: Butterfly mimics of ants. - Nature 432: 283-284. Go to original source...
    74. Thomas J.A., Elmes G.W., Wardlaw J.C. & Woyciechowski M. 1989: Host specifity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. - Oecologia 79: 425-457. Go to original source...
    75. Traill L.W., Brook B.W., Frankham R.R. & Bradshaw C.J. 2010: Pragmatic population viability targets in a rapidly changing world. - Biol. Conserv. 143: 28-34. Go to original source...
    76. Uradni list RS 2002: Rules on the Inclusion of Endangered Plant and Animal Species in the Red List. Official Gazette of the Republic Slovenia No. 82/2002, Uradni list Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana [in Slovenian].
    77. Uradni list RS 2004: Decree on Protected Wild Animal Species. Official Gazzete of the Republic Slovenia No. 46/04, Uradni list Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana [in Slovenian].
    78. Van Dyck H. & Baguette M. 2005: Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? - Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 535-545. Go to original source...
    79. Verovnik R., Rebeušek F. & Jež M. 2012: Atlas of Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) of Slovenia. Atlas faunae et florae Sloveniae 3. Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Miklavž na Dravskem polju, 456 pp.
    80. Verovnik R., Zakšek V., Govedič M., Zakšek B., Kogovšek N., Grobelnik V. & Šalamun A. 2015: Establishment and Implementation of Monitoring of Selected Target Butterfly Species in 2014 and 2015. Final Report. University of Ljubljana, 154 pp. [in Slovenian].
    81. Weyer J. & Schmitt T. 2013: Knowing the way home: Strong philopatry of a highly mobile insect species, Brenthis ino. - J. Insect Conserv. 17: 1197-1208. Go to original source...
    82. White G.C. & Burnham K.P. 1999: Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. - Bird Study 46: 120-139. Go to original source...
    83. Witek M., Nowicki P., Śliwińska E.B., Skórka P., Settele J., Schönrogge K. & Woyciechowski M. 2010: Local host ant specificity of Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius butterfly, an obligatory social parasite of Myrmica ants. - Ecol. Entomol. 35: 557-564. Go to original source...
    84. Wynhoff I. 1999: Action plan for Maculinea butterflies in Europe. In Munguira M.L. & Martín J. (eds): Nature and Environment. Council of Europe Publishing, Strassbourg, 64 pp.
    85. Wynhoff I. 2001: At Home on Foreign Meadows: The Reintroduction of two Maculinea Butterfly Species. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, 226 pp.
    86. Zakšek V., Zakšek B., Fišer Ž. & Verovnik R. 2018: The status of Large blues in Slovenia: a decade of monitored decline. In Podlesnik J. & Klokočovnik V. (eds): Book of Abstracts. Fifth Slovenian Entomological Symposium, Maribor 21.-22. September 2018. University of Maribor, p. 37.
    87. Zakšek B., Verovnik R., Zakšek V., Kogovšek N. & Govedič M. 2022: Monitoring of Selected Target Butterfly Species in 2022. Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Miklavž na Dravskem polju, 92 pp. [in Slovenian].
    88. Zakšek B., Verovnik R., Zakšek V., Kogovšek N., Govedič M., Šalamun A., Grobelnik V. & Lešnik A. 2016: Monitoring of Selected Target Butterfly Species in 2016. Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Miklavž na Dravskem polju, 110 pp. [in Slovenian].
    89. Zimmermann K., Fric Z., Jiskra P., Kopeckova M., Vlasanek P., Zapletal M. & Konvicka M. 2011: Mark-recapture on large spatial scale reveals long distance dispersal in the Marsh Fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia. - Ecol. Entomol. 36: 499-510. Go to original source...
    90. Zonneveld C. & Metz J.A. 1991: Models on butterfly protandry: virgin females are at risk to die. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 40: 308-321. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content