Eur. J. Entomol. 102 (3): 539-545, 2005 | 10.14411/eje.2005.077

Landscape parameters explain the distribution and abundance of Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae)

Jean-Pierre SARTHOU1, Annie OUIN1, Florent ARRIGNON1, GaŽl BARREAU2, Bernard BOUYJOU1
1 Ecole Nationale Supťrieure Agronomique de Toulouse, UMR Dynafor, BP 107, F-31326 Auzeville-Tolosane, France; e-mail:
2 12, rue Claude Bizot, F-33170 Gradignan, France

We studied the importance of forest structure (shape, edge length and orientation) and the crop mosaic (percentage of crops in the total land cover, within 100 and 2000 m from the forests) to the dynamics of an aphidophagous hoverfly Episyrphus balteatus. Adults were collected by Malaise traps located within and on the south- and north-facing edges of 54 forests. In winter, E. balteatus was only found on south-facing edges because of the greater insolation and temperature. In summer, it was more abundant on north-facing edges because of the abundant presence of flowers. In spring, more adults were found on long and south-facing edges than on northern edges. The presence of shrubs within 2000 m also positively affected abundance. In autumn, abundance was positively associated with length of the north-facing edge and forest shape. Emergence traps revealed that in southern France, E. balteatus may overwinter in the larval or puparial stage in forest edges. Overwintering was earlier reported only in adults. Landscape structure, length of forest edges and probably presence of shrub fallows, influence abundance of Episyrphus balteatus.

Keywords: Syrphidae, Episyrphus balteatus, distribution, abundance, seasons, forest edges, landscape

Received: September 27, 2004; Accepted: April 13, 2005; Published: August 15, 2005

Download citation


  1. ANKERSMIT G.W., DIJKMAN H., KEUNING N.J., MERTENS H., SINS A. & TACOMA H.M. 1986: Episyrphus balteatus as a predator of the aphid Sitobion avenae on winter wheat. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 42: 271-277 Go to original source...
  2. AUBERT J., AUBERT J.J. & GOELDLIN P. 1976: Douze ans de captures systematiques de Syrphides (Dipteres) au col de Bretolet (Alpes valaisannes). Bull. Soc. Entomol. Suisse 49: 115-142
  3. BALENT G. & COURTIADE B. 1992: Modelling bird communities / landscape patterns relationships in a rural area of SouthWestern France. Landsc. Ecol. 6: 195-211 Go to original source...
  4. CORBETT A. 1998: The importance of movements in the response of natural enemies to habitat manipulation. In Pickett C.H. & Bugg R.L.: Enhancing Biological Control. University of California Press, Los Angeles, 422 pp
  5. FRIDEN H., KOIVULA K. & WOLD S. 1994: Simca for Windows. UMETRI AB
  6. GROEGER U. 1993: Investigations on the regulation of cereal aphid populations under the influence of the structure of agroecosystems. AgrarGkologie 6, 169 pp. [in German]
  7. GURR M., WRATTEN S.D. & ALTIERI M.A. 2004: Ecological Engineering for Pest Management: Advances in Habitat Manipulation for Arthropods. CAB International, Wallingford, 256 p
  8. GUYON J.P., BESSIERES F., FAINGNAERT O. & BOIS J.C. 1996: Evolution des formations boisees sur le territoire de deux communes du canton d'Aurignac (Haute-Garonne) de 1942 L 1992. In Balent G. (ed.): La Foret Paysanne dans l'Espace Rural. Biodiversite, Paysages, Produits. INRA, Paris, p. 268
  9. HONEK A. 1983: Factors affecting the distribution of larvae of aphid predators (Col., Coccinellidae and Dipt., Syrphidae) in cereal stands. Z. Angew. Entomol. 95: 336-345 Go to original source...
  10. KAREIVA P. 1987: Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Nature 326: 388-390 Go to original source...
  11. KRUESS A. & TSCHARNTKE T. 1994: Habitat fragmentation, species loss and biological control. Science 264: 1581-1584. Go to original source...
  12. LANDIS D.A., WRATTEN S.D. & GURR G.M. 2000: Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu. Rev. Entomol . 45: 175-201 Go to original source...
  13. LEWIS T. 1965: The effects of an artificial wind break on the aerial distribution of flying insects. Ann. Appl. Biol. 55: 503-512 Go to original source...
  14. LYON J.P. 1967: Deplacements et migrations chez les Syrphidae. Ann. Epiphyties 18(1): 117-118
  15. MAC ARTHUR R.H. & WILSON E.O. 1967: The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princetown University Press, Princetown, 224 pp
  16. MARINO P.C. & LANDIS D.A. 1996: Effect of landscape structure on parasitoid diversity and parasitism in agroecosystems. Ecol. Applic. 6: 276-284 Go to original source...
  17. MOLTHAN J. 1990: Composition, community structure and seasonal abundance of hoverflies (Dipt., Syrphidae) on field margin biotopes in the Hersian Ried. Mitt. Dt. Ges. Allg. Angew. Entomol. 7: 368-379
  18. NAES T. & MARTENS H. 1989: Multivariate Calibration. John Wiley, New York, 438 pp
  19. NENTWIG W. 1988: Augmentation of beneficial arthropods by strip management. I - Succession of predaceous arthropods and long-term change in the ratio of phytophagous and predacious arthropods in a meadow. Oecologia 76: 597-606 Go to original source...
  20. OUIN A., SARTHOU J.P., BOUYJOU B., DECONCHAT M., LACOMBE J.P. & MONTEIL C. (in press): The species-area relationship in the hoverfly (Diptera, Syrphidae) communities of forest fragments in southern France. Ecography
  21. POEHLING H.-M. 1988: Auftreten von Syrphiden- und Coccinellidenlarven in Winterweizen von 1984-1987 in Relation zur Abundanz von Getreideblattlaeusen. Mitt. Dt. Ges. Allg. Angew. Entomol. 6: 248-254
  22. ROBERT Y., BRUNEL E., MALET P. & BAUTRAIS P. 1976: Distribution spatiale des pucerons ailes et de dipteres dans une parcelle de bocage, en fonction des modifications climatiques provoquees par les haies. In INRA, CNRS, ENSAT and Rennes U.D. (eds): Les Bocages, Histoires, Economie, Ecologie. pp. 427-435
  23. ROJO S., GILBERT F., MARCOS-GARCIA M.A., NIETO J.M. & MIER M.P. 2003: A World Review of Predatory Hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae: Syrphinae) and Their Prey. CIBIO Ediciones, Alicante, 320 pp
  24. RUSSELL E.P. 1989: Enemies hypothesis: A review of the effect of vegetational diversity on predatory insects and parasitoids. Environ. Entomol. 18: 590-599 Go to original source...
  25. SARTHOU J.P. 1996: Contribution L l'Etude Systematique, Biogeographique et Agroecocenotique des Syrphides (Insecta, Diptera) du Sud-Ouest de la France. PhD. thesis, INP Toulouse, 251 pp
  26. SCHNEIDER F. 1948: Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Generationsverhaeltnisse und Diapause raeuberischen Schwebfliegen (Syrphidae, Diptera). Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges . 21: 249-285
  27. SPEIGHT M.C.D. 2003: Species account of European Syrphidae (Diptera) 2003. In Speight M.C.D., Castella E., Sarthou J.-P. & Ball S. (eds): Syrph the Net, the Database of European Syrphidae. Vol. 39. Syrph the Net publications, Dublin, 209 pp
  28. SPEIGHT M.C.D., CASTELLA E. & OBRDLIK P. 2003: Macrohabitats preferences of European Syrphidae (Diptera). In Speight M.C.D., Castella E., Sarthou J.-P. & Ball S. (eds): Syrph the Net, the Database of European Syrphidae. Vol. 40. Syrph the Net publications, Dublin, 552 pp
  29. TENENHAUS M. 1998: La Regression PLS, Theorie et Pratique. Technip, Paris, 254 pp
  30. TENHUMBERG B. & POEHLING H.M. 1995: Syrphids as natural enemies of cereal aphids in Germany: aspects of their biology and efficacy in different years and regions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 52(1): 39-43 Go to original source...
  31. THIES C. & TSCHARNTKE T. 1999: Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285: 893-895 Go to original source...
  32. THOMAS M.B., WRATTEN S.D. & SOTHERTON N.W. 1992: Creation of "Island" habitats in farmland to manipulate populations of beneficial arthropods: predator densities and species composition. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 524-531 Go to original source...
  33. TSCHARNTKE T. & KRUESS A. 1999: Habitat fragmentation and biological control. In Hawkins B.A. & Cornell H.V. (eds): Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 190-205
  34. WRATTEN S.D. & THOMAS M.B. 1990: Environmental manipulation for the encouragement of natural enemies of pests. Monograph of British Crop Protection Council No. 45 . pp. 87-92